Abstract:Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a major cause of disease burden around the world. There is known clinical variation in how LBP is treated and addressed; with one cited reason the lack of availability, or use of, evidence-based guidance for clinicians, consumers, and administrators. Despite this a considerable number of policy directives such as clinical practice guidelines, models of care and clinical tools with the aim of improving quality of LBP care do exist. Here we report on the development of a repository of LBP directives developed in the Australian health system and a content analysis of those directives aimed at deepening our understanding of the guidance landscape. Specifically, we sought to determine: (1) What is the type, scale, and scope of LBP directives available? (2) Who are the key stakeholders that drive low back pain care through directives? (3) What content do they cover? (4) What are their gaps and deficiencies? Methods: We used online web search and snowballing methods to collate a repository of LBP policy documents collectively called 'directives' including Models of Care (MOC), information sheets, clinical tools, guidelines, surveys, and reports, from the last 20 years. The texts of the directives were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis adopting methods from descriptive policy content analysis to categorise and analyse content to determine origins, actors, and themes. Results: Eighty-four directives were included in our analysis. Of those, 55 were information sheets aimed at either healthcare providers or patients, nine were clinical tools, three were reports, four were guidelines, four were MOC, two were questionnaires and five were referral forms/criteria. The three main categories of content found in the directives were 1. Low back pain features 2. Standards for clinical encounters and 3. Management of LBP, each of which gave rise to different themes and subthemes. Universities, not-for-profit organizations, government organisations, hospitals/Local Health Districts, professional organisations, consumers, and health care insurers were all involved in the production of policy directives. However, there were no clear patterns of roles, responsibilities or authority between these stakeholder groups. Conclusion: Directives have the potential to inform practice and to contribute to reducing evidence-policy-practice discordance. Documents in our repository demonstrate that while a range of directives exist across Australia, but the evidence base for many was not apparent. Qualitative content analysis of the directives showed that while there has been increasing attention given to models of care, this is not yet reflected in directives, which generally focus on more specific elements of LBP care at the individual patient and practitioner level. The sheer number and variety of directives, from a wide range of sources and various locations within the Australian health system suggests a fragmented policy landscape without clear authoritative sources. There is a need for clearer, easily accessible trustworthy policy directives that are regularly reviewed and that meet the needs of care providers, and information websites need to be evaluated regularly for their evidence-based nature and quality.

Development of low back pain curriculum content standards for entry-level clinical training

Development of a low back pain care pathway in an academic hospital system: results of a consensus process

Best practice care for acute low back pain: A new clinical standard to assist general practitioners

Common Clinical Practice for Low Back Pain Treatment: A Modified Delphi Study

Assessing the knowledge of low back pain among physiotherapists in Spain: A cohort study with pre- and post-educational course evaluation

Clinical care standards for the management of low back pain: a scoping review

What guides back pain care? A content analysis of low back pain directives in the Australian context

Consensus for a primary care clinical decision‐making tool for assessing, diagnosing, and managing low back pain in Alberta, Canada

Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Structured and Standardized Education or Advice for Chronic Primary low back pain in Adults

Managing Low Back Pain in Rural Uganda: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Perspectives and Practices of Frontline Health Workers regarding LBP Management in Primary Care.

Lower back pain amongst medical trainees in clinical rotations: implications for choosing future career regarding medical practice

An online training resource for clinicians to optimise exercise prescription for persistent low back pain: Design, development and usability testing

Recent clinical practice guidelines for the management of low back pain: a global comparison

Clinical practice guidelines for the noninvasive management of low back pain: A systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration

The Global Spine Care Initiative: applying evidence-based guidelines on the non-invasive management of back and neck pain to low- and middle-income communities

Acute low back pain: Epidemiology, etiology, and prevention: WFNS spine committee recommendations

Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society

Effects of workplace, family and cultural influences on low back pain: What opportunities exist to address social factors in general consultations?

The Global Spine Care Initiative: a narrative review of psychological and social issues in back pain in low- and middle-income communities

'Look up from the waiting list and see the bigger picture': A qualitative analysis of clinical specialist physiotherapist perspectives on low back pain care in Ireland

A Cross-cultural Study of the Back Pain Beliefs of Female Undergraduate Healthcare Students