Abstract:POD-DL-ROMs have been recently proposed as an extremely versatile strategy to build accurate and reliable reduced order models (ROMs) for nonlinear parametrized partial differential equations, combining (i) a preliminary dimensionality reduction obtained through proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) for the sake of efficiency, (ii) an autoencoder architecture that further reduces the dimensionality of the POD space to a handful of latent coordinates, and (iii) a dense neural network to learn the map that describes the dynamics of the latent coordinates as a function of the input parameters and the time variable. Within this work, we aim at justifying the outstanding approximation capabilities of POD-DL-ROMs by means of a thorough error analysis, showing how the sampling required to generate training data, the dimension of the POD space, and the complexity of the underlying neural networks, impact on the solutions us to formulate practical criteria to control the relative error in the approximation of the solution field of interest, and derive general error estimates. Furthermore, we show that, from a theoretical point of view, POD-DL-ROMs outperform several deep learning-based techniques in terms of model complexity. Finally, we validate our findings by means of suitable numerical experiments, ranging from parameter-dependent operators analytically defined to several parametrized PDEs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to verify the efficiency and accuracy of POD - DL - ROMs (reduced - order models combining deep learning and orthogonal decomposition) in solving nonlinear parameterized partial differential equations through detailed error analysis. Specifically, the authors aim to:
1. **Error Decomposition**: Decompose the overall error of POD - DL - ROMs into three parts: sampling error (ES), POD projection error (EPOD), and neural network approximation error (ENN). These errors correspond respectively to the uncertainties in data sampling, dimension reduction, and neural network training processes.
2. **Error Estimation**: Provide specific upper and lower bounds for each error term, thereby providing practical criteria for controlling the relative error. This helps to understand how different factors (such as the sampling of training data, the dimension of the POD space, and the complexity of the neural network) affect the accuracy of the final solution.
3. **Theoretical Comparison**: Prove theoretically that POD - DL - ROMs are superior to other deep - learning - based reduced - order model techniques, such as POD + DNN and DeepONets, in terms of model complexity.
4. **Numerical Verification**: Verify the validity of the above - mentioned theoretical analysis through a series of numerical experiments, covering problems from analytically defined parameter - dependent operators to multiple parameterized partial differential equations.
### Main Contributions
- **Error Analysis Framework**: Propose a systematic error analysis framework for evaluating the performance of POD - DL - ROMs.
- **Error Decomposition Formula**: Derive an error decomposition formula that clearly indicates each error source and its impact on the overall error.
- **Error Upper and Lower Bounds**: Provide specific error upper and lower bounds, providing a theoretical basis for model design and optimization.
- **Numerical Experiments**: Verify the theoretical results through multiple numerical experiments, demonstrating the superior performance of POD - DL - ROMs in handling complex problems.
### Key Concepts
- **POD (Proper Orthogonal Decomposition)**: A technique for dimension reduction that reduces the dimension of data by extracting main features.
- **DL - ROMs (Deep Learning Reduced Order Models)**: Reduced - order models combined with deep learning, used to efficiently solve complex partial differential equations.
- **Error Decomposition**: Decompose the overall error into sampling error, projection error, and neural network approximation error in order to better understand and control error sources.
### Mathematical Formulas
- **Error Decomposition Formula**:
\[
E_R \leq E_S + E_{POD} + E_{NN}
\]
where:
- \(E_S\) is the sampling error, satisfying \(E_S \overset{a.s.}{\to} 0\) and \(E[E_S]=O(N_s^{- 1/4}+N_t^{1/2})\).
- \(E_{POD}\) is the POD projection error, satisfying \(E_{POD} \overset{a.s.}{\to} E_{POD,\infty}\), where \(E_{POD,\infty}\) is independent of the sampling criterion.
- \(E_{NN}\) is the neural network approximation error, depending on the approximation ability of the neural network.
- **Error Upper Bound**:
\[
E_R \leq m^{-1}\left(\int_{P\times T}\|u(\mu, t)-V V^T u(\mu, t)\|^2 d(\mu, t)\right)^{1/2}+\left(\int_{P\times T}\|V q(\mu, t)-V \hat{q}(\mu, t)\|^2 w(\mu, t) d(\mu, t)\right)^{1/2}
\]
### Conclusion
Through detailed theoretical analysis and numerical experiments, this paper proves the efficiency and accuracy of POD - DL - ROMs in solving nonlinear parameterized partial differential equations and provides an important theoretical basis for model design and optimization.