Should I Just Stick to the Wall? Evaluating the Social Acceptance and Preferred Driving Side of Wall Following

Robinson, Nicole

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-024-01141-1

IF: 3.802

2024-06-06

International Journal of Social Robotics

Abstract:The need for safe, predictable, and reliable robot navigation is fundamental for mobile robots to move around in home and office environments. Shortest-path navigation is a popular robot navigation method that uses the most efficient path to get to the desired goal. This behaviour is not always easy to interpret, understand, and avoid in a congested hallway. Instead, more predictable navigation methods, such as a robot following a wall, can help increase social acceptance and help avoid the robot crossing the pedestrian path. If a robot follows along a wall, a key variable to consider is the preferred driving side of the robot (left or right) in areas such as in narrow passages, and its perceived impact on social acceptance. This international user study (n = 143) involved an online video-based test to compare robot evaluation and social acceptance for two types of mobile navigation (Wall-Following and Shortest Path), including the preferred driving side for Wall-Following. A Fetch robot navigated from start to goal position in a series of indoor scenarios with a pedestrian. Select scenarios included a hallway, doorway, and intersection. Independent Sample T-Tests results found that Wall-Following was rated significantly higher than Shortest Path for being perceived as more comfortable and predictable, regardless of robot driving side. The preference for the driver side of the robot did not match the country of residence, nor did it have a significant impact on robot ratings. There were significant interaction effects for comfort, safety and predictable scores across two timepoints. Given the popularity of Shortest Path navigation, the findings indicate that this approach might not be the most appropriate for human settings. Additional investigation into Wall-Following behaviours is recommended for social acceptance, even if the method compromises the efficiency of the robot to acheive its objective.

robotics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how mobile robots can navigate in a more socially acceptable way in home and office environments. Specifically, the research focuses on the social acceptability of two navigation methods - Wall Following (WF) and Shortest Path (SP) - and the preferred driving side (left or right). The paper explores the following four research questions:

1. **RQ1**: Do participants report differences in predictability, comfort, and safety between Wall - Following and Shortest - Path behaviors?
2. **RQ2**: Do participants report differences in the robotic social attributes between Wall - Following and Shortest - Path behaviors?
3. **RQ3**: Do participants have a preference for the side (left or right) that the robot chooses to follow the wall in the same direction as the local traffic flow?
4. **RQ4**: How does the robot's behavior affect people's perception of the safety of their surrounding environment? Can this perception be predicted by predictability and comfort?

Through these questions, the paper aims to evaluate whether the Wall - Following navigation method is more socially acceptable than the Shortest - Path navigation method in indoor office environments such as narrow corridors, and to explore the impact of different driving sides (left or right) on social acceptability. This helps to design robot navigation methods that are more in line with human social norms and expectations, thereby increasing the usage rate and acceptance of robots in home and office environments.