A STUDY OF DYSLEXIA
E. Warrington,O. L. Zangwill
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.20.3.208
1957-08-01
Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Abstract:The syndrome of "pure alexia ", i.e., alexia without aphasia or agraphia, was first recorded in this country by Broadbent (1872) and a number of cases have since been described in the literature. Adequate historical accounts have been given by de Massary (1932), Weisenberg and McBride (1935), and Russell Brain (1955). In recent years, fresh interest in the syndrome has been aroused by the excellent study of Holmes (1950). Its possible relevance to the problem of specific reading disability in children (Ettlinger and Jackson, 1955) provides additional grounds for further inquiry. Although " pure alexia" is widely accepted as a clinical entity, it has often been pointed out that the term is a misnomer. In the first place, the defect of reading is commonly, if not invariably, associated with other visual deficits. Apart from right hemianopia (which, with one doubtful exception, has been reported in every published case known to us), an apparently specific defect of colour recognition is almost invariably linked with alexia (Poetzl, 1928; Stengel, 1948). Some degree of visual-spatial agnosia or disorientation has also been claimed by several authors (Wolpert, 1930; Martin, 1954). In the second place, minor grades of dysphasia, dysgraphia, and dyscalculia can be traced in the majority of published cases (Weisenberg and McBride, 1935) and may in the opinion of many invariably be elicited on careful examination (Critchley, 1953). None the less, the predominance in certain cases of reading disability without appreciable involvement of other functions, visual or linguistic, would appear an established fact (Brain, 1955). To this extent at least, alexia may be said to present as a circumscribed psychological deficit. The cerebral localization of alexia is a matter of some interest. Whereas the locus of the lesion provoking this syndrome was for long held to be the left angular gyrus (Dejerine, 1914), more recent work has consistently implicated the basal parts of the occipital lobe, in particular the lingual and fusiform gyri. Some damage to callosal fibres has also been adduced in the majority of cases verified by necropsy (Kleist, 1934; Gloning, Gloning, Seitelberger, and Tschabitscher, 1955). It is also noteworthy that alexia without other signs of visual agnosia has been reported regularly to follow left occipital lobectomy (Hecaen, Ajuriaguerra, and David, 1952). In its more circumscribed forms at least, alexia would clearly appear to be a syndrome of the dominant occipital lobe. It has been traditional to regard alexia as a highly selective variety of visual agnosia, i.e., a loss or defect of recognition limited to linguistic symbols (though numerals are often excepted). Russell Brain (1955), for example, considers the basic defect to lie in a failure on the part of the perceived material to arouse the visual word-schemes (" memory traces ") which may be assumed to mediate recognition of words and evocation of their meanings. Although this view commands wide acceptance it has not gone unchallenged. As long ago as 1930, Beringer and Stein attempted an explanation of alexia in terms not of a symbolic defect but of an abnormal functional lability (pathologische Funktionswandel) of the visual system. This lability was held to produce what is in effect a concentric constriction of vision leading to grossly impaired perception of fine detail.* In more recent years a similar explanation has been repeatedly advocated by Bay (1950, 1953) with reference to agnosia in general. It is pertinent to note that Martin (1954) has also laid stress on sensory deficits, in particular visual disorientation, as causal factors in alexia. One may comment that although the role of visuo-sensory impairment in alexia may well be appreciable, the existence of a specific and localized central defect of recognition can certainly not be ruled out. Indeed cases such as that of Holmes (1950) render explanation in terms other than symbolic loss extremely difficult to contemplate. In view of the important part played by eye movements in reading, it has been suggested that some aspects of dyslexia may be traced to derangement in the oculo-motor sphere. Thus, a defect of fixation