Radiation protection in CT-guided interventions: does real-time dose visualisation lead to a reduction in radiation dose to participating radiologists? A single-centre evaluation

A. Koch,T. Gruber-Rouh,S. Zangos,K. Eichler,T. Vogl,L. Basten
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.01.028
IF: 3.389
2024-02-18
Clinical Radiology
Abstract:AIM To evaluate if real-time dose visualisation during computed tomography (CT)-guided interventions leads to a reduction in radiation dose to participating radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS The individual radiation dose radiologists are exposed to during CT interventions was measured using dedicated dosimeters (RaySafe i2-system, Unfors RaySafe GmbH, Billdal, Sweden) worn over the usual radiation protective apron. Initially, only the total radiation dose was measured, without visualisation (control group). In the following study period, the radiation dose was shown to participants on a live screen in real-time (experimental group). In both groups, the dose was recorded in 1-second intervals. The results collected were evaluated by comparison using descriptive statistics and mixed-effect models. In particular, the variables experience, gender, role, and position during the intervention were analysed. RESULTS In total, 517 measurements of 304 interventions ( n= 249 with and n= 268 without live screen) performed by 29 radiologists acting as interventionalists or assistants were analysed. All CT-guided interventions were performed percutaneously, the majority of which ( n= 280) were microwave ablations (MWA). Radiation doses in the group without visualisation were comparable with usual dose rates for the corresponding intervention type. The mean total radiation dose was reduced by 58.1% (11.6 versus 4.86 μSv) in the experimental group ( p= 0.034). The highest reduction of 78.5% (15.55 versus 3.35 μSv) was observed in radiologists with the role of assistant ( p= 0.002). Sub-analysis showed significant dose reduction ( p< 0.0001) for the use of live screen in general; considering all variables, the role "assistant" alone had a statistically significant influence ( p= 0.002). CONCLUSION The real-time visualisation of active radiation dose during CT interventions leads to a relevant reduction in radiation dose to participating radiologists.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?