Abstract:Background Zilebesiran is an investigational RNA interference therapeutic targeting hepatic angiotensinogen synthesis. In KARDIA-1, a single subcutaneous (SC) dose of zilebesiran monotherapy significantly reduced 24-hr mean ambulatory and office systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline to Months 3 and 6 versus placebo. The Phase 2 KARDIA-2 study assessed efficacy and safety of zilebesiran with a standard oral antihypertensive in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Purpose Uncontrolled hypertension is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and medication non-adherence affects blood pressure control. Developing effective, long-lasting treatments is crucial for patients with hypertension uncontrolled by standard therapy. Methods KARDIA-2 enrolled adults with mild-to-moderate hypertension who were untreated or receiving stable therapy with ≤2 antihypertensives. Patients discontinued prior antihypertensive medication and were randomized 10:7:4 to open-label, once-daily oral treatment with 40 mg olmesartan, 5 mg amlodipine, or 2.5 mg indapamide. After ≥4 weeks on protocol-specified medication, patients with a 24-hr mean ambulatory SBP of 130–160 mmHg were randomized 1:1 in a double-blind manner to a single SC dose of zilebesiran 600 mg or placebo as add-on therapy. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to Month 3 in 24-hr mean ambulatory SBP versus placebo for each group. Efficacy and safety were also assessed in pre-specified subgroups: age (<65; ≥65 years), sex, race (Black; other), baseline 24-hr mean ambulatory SBP (<145; ≥145 mmHg), and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (≥60; <60 mL/min/1.73m2). Results The primary analysis included 667 patients (median age [range] 59 [27–75] years; 57% male, 28% Black). At Month 3, least-squares mean differences (LSMD) (95% confidence interval [CI]) between zilebesiran and placebo for the olmesartan, amlodipine, and indapamide groups were −4.0 (−7.6, −0.3), −9.7 (−12.9, −6.6), and −12.1 (−16.5, −7.6) mmHg, respectively, for 24-hr mean ambulatory SBP (all p<0.05). LSMD (95% CI) in office SBP for the same groups were −7.0 (−10.4, −3.6), −10.2 (−13.5, −6.9), and −18.5 (−22.8, −14.2) mmHg, respectively, (all p<0.001). SBP reductions were consistent across subgroups, except for a trend towards an attenuated response observed in Black patients (Figs 1, 2). More patients receiving zilebesiran (49–58%) than placebo (39–48%) experienced ≥1 adverse event through Month 6, with low rates of hyperkalaemia, hypotension, or acute kidney injury reported across all groups. Conclusion In KARDIA-2, a single dose of zilebesiran significantly reduced SBP versus placebo at Month 3 on top of a standard oral antihypertensive, with encouraging safety data. SBP reduction was consistent across most subgroups. Treatment with zilebesiran combined with standard antihypertensives may be effective for a broad population of patients with hypertension uncontrolled on monotherapy.

KARDIA-3 STUDY DESIGN: ZILEBESIRAN AS ADD-ON THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH CARDIOVASCULAR RISK AND HYPERTENSION INADEQUATELY CONTROLLED BY STANDARD OF CARE ANTIHYPERTENSIVES

ZILEBESIRAN AS ADD-ON THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION INADEQUATELY CONTROLLED WITH A STANDARD ANTIHYPERTENSIVE MEDICATION: EFFICACY AND SAFETY RESULTS FROM THE KARDIA-2 STUDY

Subgroup results from KARDIA-2: impact of demographic and baseline disease characteristics on zilebesiran response in patients with hypertension uncontrolled by a standard oral antihypertensive

RNA Interference With Zilebesiran for Mild to Moderate Hypertension: The KARDIA-1 Randomized Clinical Trial

Zilebesiran: A Promising Antihypertensive Therapy Inhibiting Angiotensinogen Synthesis

Zodasiran, an RNAi Therapeutic Targeting ANGPTL3, for Mixed Hyperlipidemia

Efficacy and Safety of Renal Denervation for Chinese Patients with Resistant Hypertension Using a Microirrigated Catheter: Study Design and Protocol for a Prospective Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial

Will zilebesiran, an RNA interference therapy, be effective, safe, and improve the treatment of hypertension?

A Randomized trial assessing Efficacy and safety of Mineralocorticoid receptor Antagonist therapy compared to Standard antihypertensive Therapy in hypErtension with low Renin (REMASTER): rationale and study design

OP25 Patients with Moderate to Severe Crohn’s Disease with and Without Prior Biologic Failure Demonstrate Improved Endoscopic Outcomes with Risankizumab: Results from Phase 3 Induction and Maintenance Trials

Single Ascending and Multiple-Dose Trial of Zerlasiran, a Short Interfering RNA Targeting Lipoprotein(a)

Efficacy and safety of LCZ696, a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, in Asian patients with hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Clazakizumab for the treatment of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplant recipients: Phase 3 IMAGINE study rationale and design

GenePHIT phase 2 study design: a double blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of AB-1002 gene therapy in adults with heart failure

11βHSD1 Inhibition with AZD4017 Improves Lipid Profiles and Lean Muscle Mass in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

Plozasiran, an RNA Interference Agent Targeting APOC3, for Mixed Hyperlipidemia

Aldosterone synthase inhibitor (BI 690517) therapy for people with diabetes and albuminuric chronic kidney disease: A multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, Phase I trial

Sacubitril/valsartan versus valsartan in regressing myocardial fibrosis in hypertension: a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint clinical trial protocol

LONG-TERM CLINICAL OUTCOME OF PHYSIOLOGY-GUIDED RENAL ARTERY STENTING WITH ZETAROLIMUS ELUTING STENTS IN PATIENTS WITH UNCONTROLLED RENOVASCULAR HYPERTENSION

PRECLINICAL AND CLINICAL EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF A NOVEL MULTI-TARGET SMALL MOLECULE MT-1207 FOR HYPERTENSION

G-008 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF THREE DOSES OF LCZ696 IN ASIAN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS