Prediction of prognosis and pathologic grade in follicular lymphoma using 18F-FDG PET/CT

Hongyan Li,Min Wang,Yajing Zhang,Fan Hu,Kun Wang,Chenyang Wang,Zairong Gao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.943151
IF: 4.7
2022-07-28
Frontiers in Oncology
Abstract:Purpose We investigated the utility of a new baseline PET parameter expressing lesion dissemination and metabolic parameters for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and pathologic grade in follicular lymphoma (FL). Methods The baseline 18 F-FDG PET/CT images of 126 patients with grade 1–3A FL were retrospectively analyzed. A novel PET/CT parameter characterizing lesion dissemination, the distance between two lesions that were furthest apart ( D max ), was calculated. The total metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were computed by using 41% of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max ) thresholding method. Results The 5-year PFS rate was 51.9% for all patients. In the multivariate analysis, high D max [ P = 0.046; hazard ratio (HR) = 2.877], high TLG ( P = 0.004; HR = 3.612), and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase ( P = 0.041; HR = 2.287) were independent predictors of PFS. A scoring system for prognostic stratification was established based on these three adverse factors, and the patients were classified into three risk categories: low risk (zero to one factor, n = 75), intermediate risk (two adverse factors, n = 29), and high risk (three adverse factors, n = 22). Patients in the high-risk group had a shorter 3-year PFS (21.7%) than those in the low- and intermediate-risk groups (90.6 and 44.6%, respectively) ( P < 0.001). The C-index of our scoring system for PFS (0.785) was superior to the predictive capability of the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI), FLIPI2, and PRIMA-Prognostic Index (C-index: 0.628–0.701). The receiver operating characteristic curves and decision curve analysis demonstrated that the scoring system had better differentiation and clinical utility than these existing indices. In addition, the median SUV max was significantly higher in grade 3A (36 cases) than in grades 1 and 2 FL (90 cases) (median: 13.63 vs. 11.45, P = 0.013), but a substantial overlap existed (range: 2.25–39.62 vs. 3.17–39.80). Conclusion TLG and D max represent two complementary aspects of the disease, capturing the tumor burden and lesion dissemination. TLG and D max are promising metrics for identifying patients at a high risk of progression or relapse. Additionally, SUV max seems to have some value for distinguishing grade 3A from low-grade FL but cannot substitute for biopsy.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?