Anthropometric measures and adverse outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: revisiting the obesity paradox
Jawad H Butt,Mark C Petrie,Pardeep S Jhund,Naveed Sattar,Akshay S Desai,Lars Køber,Jean L Rouleau,Karl Swedberg,Michael R Zile,Scott D Solomon,Milton Packer,John J V McMurray
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad083
IF: 39.3
2023-03-23
European Heart Journal
Abstract:Although body mass index (BMI) is the most commonly used anthropometric measure, newer indices such as the waist-to-height ratio, better reflect the location and amount of ectopic fat, as well as the weight of the skeleton, and may be more useful. The prognostic value of several newer anthropometric indices was compared with that of BMI in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) enrolled in prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to determine impact on global mortality and morbidity in heart failure. The primary outcome was HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death. The association between anthropometric indices and outcomes were comprehensively adjusted for other prognostic variables, including natriuretic peptides. An 'obesity-survival paradox' related to lower mortality risk in those with BMI ≥25 kg/m 2 (compared with normal weight) was identified but this was eliminated by adjustment for other prognostic variables. This paradox was less evident for waist-to-height ratio (as an exemplar of indices not incorporating weight) and eliminated by adjustment: the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for all-cause mortality, for quintile 5 vs. quintile 1, was 1.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–1.39]. However, both BMI and waist-to-height ratio showed that greater adiposity was associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome and HF hospitalization; this was more evident for waist-to-height ratio and persisted after adjustment e.g. the aHR for HF hospitalization for quintile 5 vs. quintile 1 of waist-to-height ratio was 1.39 (95% CI 1.06–1.81). In patients with HFrEF, alternative anthropometric measurements showed no evidence for an 'obesity-survival paradox'. Newer indices that do not incorporate weight showed that greater adiposity was clearly associated with a higher risk of HF hospitalization. The upper part of the figure describes the calculation of each of the anthropometric measures. The lower part of the figure shows the risk of outcomes according to continuous body mass index (left panel) and waist-to-height ratio (right panel). The solid line represents the hazard ratio and the shaded area the 95% confidence interval. The blue spline is adjusted for treatment and region. The red spline is adjusted for treatment, age, sex, region, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, estimated glomerular filtration rate, left ventricular ejection fraction, log of n -terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, body mass index (only in the waist-to-height ratio analyses), New York Heart Association functional class, heart failure aetiology, duration of heart failure, prior heart failure hospitalization, a history of diabetes, and atrial fibrillation. BMI, body mass index; BRI, body roundness index; BSA, body surface area; BSI, body shape index; CI, confidence interval; HF, heart failure; HR, hazard ratio; RFM, relative fat mass; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; WHtR, waist-to-height ratio; WWI, weight-adjusted-waist index.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems