Transcriptome Analysis of Resistant Cotton Germplasm Responding to Reniform Nematodes

Chunda Feng,Salliana R Stetina,John E Erpelding,Salliana R. Stetina,John E. Erpelding
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13070958
2024-03-27
Plants
Abstract:Reniform nematode (Rotylenchulus reniformis) is an important microparasite for Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production. Growing resistant cultivars is the most economical management method, but only a few G. barbadense genotypes and some diploid Gossypium species confer high levels of resistance. This study conducted a transcriptome analysis of resistant genotypes to identify genes involved in host plant defense. Seedlings of G. arboreum accessions PI 529728 (A2-100) and PI 615699 (A2-190), and G. barbadense genotypes PI 608139 (GB 713) and PI 163608 (TX 110), were inoculated with the reniform nematode population MSRR04 and root samples were collected on the fifth (D5) and ninth (D9) day after inoculation. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by comparing root transcriptomes from inoculated plants with those from non-inoculated plants. Accessions A2-100 and A2-190 showed 52 and 29 DEGs on D5, respectively, with 14 DEGs in common, and 18 DEGs for A2-100 and 11 DEGs for A2-190 on chromosome 5. On D9, four DEGs were found in A2-100 and two DEGs in A2-190. For GB 713, 52 and 43 DEGs were found, and for TX 110, 29 and 117 DEGs were observed on D5 and D9, respectively. Six DEGs were common at the two sampling times for these genotypes. Some DEGs were identified as Meloidogyne-induced cotton (MIC) 3 and 4, resistance gene analogs, or receptor-like proteins. Other DEGs have potential roles in plant defense, such as peroxidases, programmed cell death, pathogenesis related proteins, and systemic acquired resistance. Further research on these DEGs will aid in understanding the mechanisms of resistance to explore new applications for the development of resistant cultivars.
plant sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the research on the resistance mechanism of upland cotton (*Gossypium hirsutum L.*) to the infection of reniform nematode (*Rotylenchulus reniformis*). Specifically, through transcriptome analysis, the researchers aim to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in resistant cotton germplasm resources in response to the infection of reniform nematode, in order to understand how these genes participate in the defense response of host plants. This is helpful for the future development of new resistant cotton varieties, thereby effectively managing the harm of reniform nematode. ### Background Information - **Reniform Nematode**: It is an important micro - parasite, which seriously affects the production of upland cotton. This nematode is a sedentary semi - endoparasite and has become one of the most important nematode species in the soil of cotton - producing areas in the United States. - **Management Methods**: Planting resistant varieties is the most cost - effective management method, but currently only a few Sea - Island cotton (*G. barbadense*) genotypes and some diploid cotton species show a high level of resistance. - **Research Purpose**: Through transcriptome analysis of resistant genotypes, identify genes involved in host nematode defense, providing a basis for further understanding the resistance mechanism and developing new resistant varieties. ### Research Methods - **Materials**: Four resistant genotypes were selected, namely PI 529728 (A2 - 100) and PI 615699 (A2 - 190) of *G. arboreum*, and PI 608139 (GB 713) and PI 163608 (TX 110) of *G. barbadense*. - **Experimental Design**: The seedlings of these genotypes were inoculated with the reniform nematode population MSRR04, and root samples were collected on the 5th day (D5) and the 9th day (D9) after inoculation. - **Data Analysis**: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by comparing the root transcriptomes of inoculated and non - inoculated plants. ### Main Findings - **Differentially Expressed Genes**: Multiple differentially expressed genes were identified at different time points and in different genotypes. For example, A2 - 100 had 52 DEGs at D5, of which 18 were located on chromosome 5; GB 713 had 52 DEGs at D5 and 43 DEGs at D9. - **Functional Annotation**: Some DEGs were identified as being related to nematode - induced cotton genes (such as *MIC3* and *MIC4*), resistance gene analogs or receptor - like proteins. Other DEGs may play important roles in plant defense, such as peroxidase, programmed cell death, pathogenesis - related proteins and systemic acquired resistance. ### Significance - **Resistance Mechanism**: By identifying these differentially expressed genes, researchers can better understand the resistance mechanism of cotton to reniform nematode. - **Breeding Application**: These findings provide important gene resources for the development of new resistant cotton varieties, which is helpful to improve the economic benefits and sustainability of cotton production. In conclusion, this study, through transcriptome analysis, reveals the gene expression changes in resistant cotton germplasm resources in response to the infection of reniform nematode, providing valuable scientific basis for future resistance breeding.