Decision-Making for Hospitalized Incarcerated Patients Lacking Decisional Capacity

Sarah Batbold,Jennifer D. Duke,Kirsten A. Riggan,Erin S. DeMartino

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.5794

2024-01-03

JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract:This qualitative study of medical records examines how decision-making occurs for hospitalized incarcerated persons lacking decisional capacity.

medicine, general & internal

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Decision-making among the Substitute Decision Makers in Intensive Care Units: an Investigation of Decision Control Preferences and Decisional Conflicts

Feixia Wu,Yiyu Zhuang,Xiangping Chen,Huan Wen,Wenwen Tao,Yuewen Lao,Hongchang Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14451

IF: 3.057

2020-01-01

Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract:Aims To explore decision control preferences and decisional conflicts and to analyse their association among the surrogate decision makers in the intensive care unit. Design The study carried out a cross-sectional survey among the surrogates. Methods The participants were 115 surrogate decision makers of critical patients, from August to September 2019. A Chi-squared test and logistic regression were used to assess decision control preferences and decisional conflicts, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was employed to examine their association. Results Of the 115 surrogate decision makers, 51.3% preferred a collaborative role, and 63.48% were somewhat unsure about making decisions. Logistic regression analysis identified decision control preferences was associated with surrogates' age, education level, and personality traits, while decisional conflicts was associated with surrogates' age, education level, character, medical expense burden, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II score. Cohen's kappa statistics showed a bad concordance of decision-making expectations and actuality, with kappa values of 0.158 (p < .05). Wherein surrogates who experienced discordance between their preferred and actual roles, have relatively higher decisional conflicts. Conclusion This study identified individual differences of surrogate decision makers in decision control preferences and decisional conflicts. These results imply that incorporation of the individual decision preferences and communication styles into care plans is an important first step to develop high quality decision support. Impact This research is a contribution to the limited study on decision control preferences and decisional conflicts among surrogate decision makers of critically ill patients. Moreover based on the investigation of understanding the status and related factors of decision preferences and decisional conflicts set the stage for developing effective decision support interventions.
Medical Decision Making in Correctional Facilities: Highlighting Gaps and Advocating for Policy Change

Therese A Santiago,Jeremiah Stout,Maria I Lapid,Elise C Carey,Dionne Hart

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01320-4

2024-07-29

Abstract:In the United States, a disproportionately high number of incarcerated individuals suffer from serious mental illnesses, substance use disorders, chronic medical conditions, infectious diseases, and traumatic brain injuries. Correctional facilities are often ill-equipped to address the incarcerated community's physical and mental health needs. Current laws and policies remain outdated and do not adequately address the complex health issues faced by incarcerated individuals, particularly the aging and terminally ill patients in correctional settings. We present a case of a male with schizophrenia whose ongoing psychiatric symptoms impaired his decisional capacity, leading to him to refuse medical treatment for an initially treatable medical condition, ultimately resulting in his death due to the lack of a surrogate decision-maker. This case underscores the urgent need for policy revisions to assign medical decision-making authority for individuals in custody and highlights potential interventions to bridge existing gaps in care for this population.
Decision making capacity for treatment in psychiatric inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Silvia Marcó-García,Kevin Ariyo,Gareth S Owen,Anthony S David,Gareth S. Owen,Anthony S. David

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291724000242

IF: 10.592

2024-03-05

Psychological Medicine

Abstract:Decision-making capacity (DMC) among psychiatric inpatients is a pivotal clinical concern. A review by Okai et al. (2007) suggested that most psychiatric inpatients have DMC for treatment, and its assessment is reliable. Nevertheless, the high heterogeneity and mixed results from other studies mean there is considerable uncertainty around this topic. This study aimed to update Okai's research by conducting a systematic review with meta-analysis to address heterogeneity. We performed a systematic search across four databases, yielding 5351 results. We extracted data from 20 eligible studies on adult psychiatric inpatients, covering DMC assessments from 2006 to May 2022. A meta-analysis was conducted on 11 papers, and a quality assessment was performed. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022330074). The proportion of patients with DMC for treatment varied widely based on treatment setting, the specific decision and assessment methods. Reliable capacity assessment was feasible. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Global Assessment of Function (GAF), and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) predicted clinical judgments of capacity. Schizophrenia and bipolar mania were linked to the highest incapacity rates, while depression and anxiety symptoms were associated with better capacity and insight. Unemployment was the only sociodemographic factor correlated with incapacity. Assessing mental capacity is replicable, with most psychiatric inpatients able to make treatment decisions. However, this capacity varies with admission stage, formal status (involuntary or voluntary), and information provided. The severity of psychopathology is linked to mental capacity, though detailed psychopathological data are limited.

psychiatry,psychology, clinical
Long-term, assenting psychiatric patients: decisional capacity and the quality of care

S K Hoge,T C Feucht-Haviar

Abstract:The objectives of this study were (1) to investigate whether the relationship between functional decisional capacity and the resulting quality of treatment posited by the informed consent theory is found in clinical practice; and (2) to describe the range of decisional impairments found in long-term psychiatric inpatients who comply with prescribed treatment. Eighty-eight long-term, compliant, psychiatric inpatients, in two public hospitals, who were prescribed antipsychotic medications were assessed. Following a formal assessment of decisional capacity, subjects were categorized according to level of impairment, using a hierarchical scheme. All subjects were evaluated for the presence of abnormal involuntary movements. The appropriateness of treatment with antipsychotic medications was determined using accepted clinical guidelines. Patients with more serious impairments of decisional capacity were more likely to receive inappropriate treatment with antipsychotic medication; and serious impairments of decisional capacity were common. The study lends empirical support to one of the bases of the doctrine of informed consent: the notion that capable patient involvement in decisionmaking plays an important role in checking the judgments of treating physicians. Remedial measures are needed to protect long-term psychiatric inpatients with impaired decisional capacity from receiving inappropriate treatment.
When a Patient Is at Foreseeable Risk of Losing Decisional and Functional Capacity

Matthew Robert Dernbach,Peter Ash,Esther Oyerinde,Mark A Oldham

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.240070-24

2024-09-17

Abstract:The four-skills model of decisional capacity for providing informed consent for medical treatment developed by Appelbaum and Grisso is codified into most state statutes in articulating the legal criteria for establishing capacity. Decisional capacity is traditionally determined at a point in time based on a narrow clinical question; however, there are clinical scenarios in which patients may currently have decisional capacity but their recurrent nonadherence to care places them at foreseeable risk of being acutely incapacitated, both decisionally and functionally, in the near future. There is a gap in terms of how these four skills ought to be adapted when applied to a patient with recurrent altered mental status, especially delirium, because of nonadherence. To describe this clinical situation, we introduce a new risk factor, "foreseeable risk of losing decisional and functional capacity," and discuss the clinical evaluation of a patient who currently has capacity but for whom this risk factor applies. We consider the implications of being at foreseeable risk of losing capacity and how foreseeable risk can be translated into a capacity determination in the present. We also describe interventions that can serve to protect the patient's rights and safety.
Transcultural Psychiatry in Medical Ethics: Assessing Decision-Making Capacity within the Lens of an East African Refugee

Arlen Gaba,Anna Dorsett,Samantha Ongchuan Martin,Brandon Chen,Sahil Munjal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/730871

Abstract:AbstractA 29-year-old female East African refugee with no formal psychiatric history and a medical history significant for HIV was admitted for failure to thrive and concern for bizarre behavior in the context of abandonment by her husband and separation from her child. After psychiatric evaluation, it was determined that she did not have the capacity to care for herself independently; adult protective services then pursued and was awarded guardianship. While admitted, the patient repeatedly refused medical treatment, had a feeding tube placed for forced nutrition and medications (though she did at one point remove this tube herself), and received two electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) treatments. Soon thereafter, the patient's court-appointed guardian met with the primary medical, psychiatric, and ethics teams to discuss goals of care in the setting of complex social and cultural needs. It was collectively determined that the patient's choices to refuse care (including nutrition, lab work, medications, and ECT) and some repeated behaviors (e.g., denial of divorce, denial of HIV, denial of need for care) could be considered culturally appropriate in the context of the acute stressors leading up to hospitalizations. All teams concluded, therefore, that the patient had the capacity to refuse these interventions and that further forced intervention would pose a greater chance of exacerbating her already-significant trauma history than improving her outcomes. Ultimately, the patient was able to be discharged into the care of her guardian, who would assist her in receiving support from members of her community who share her language and culture.
Dental decision-making under general anesthesia for patients with disabilities: A qualitative study

Danielle McGeown,Caoimhin Mac Giolla Phadraig,Dale Whelehan,June H Nunn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.12631

Abstract:Aims: This paper explores the variables which influence decision-making processes in dentists providing dental care for people with disabilities under general anesthesia (GA). Methods: Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were undertaken on a purposive sample. Audio recordings were transcribed and checked for accuracy. Using thematic content analysis methods open codes were developed inductively. Codes were analyzed further by three authors adopting a deductive approach, leading to final coding, sorting and themes, subtheme and framework development. Results: Three themes emerged. The first theme explored Shared Decision Making, or lack thereof, as it influenced clinical reasoning. The second (Systematic, Analytical) and third (Intuition, and heuristics) themes explored features of clinical judgment as considered under dual process theory. Dentists primarily used intuitive decision-making processes and heuristic styled processes (or cognitive mental frames) assisted in intuition to extract teeth, without engaging type 2 processes. Conclusion: The dentists experience subtle modifiers to their decision-making that ultimately promote extraction of teeth under GA for people with disabilities. Bias training, simulation and post-hoc reflection are examples of recommendations which may be used to improve decision-making in this area.
Determining medical decision-making capacity in brain tumor patients: why and how?

Andrea Pace,Johan A F Koekkoek,Martin J van den Bent,Helen J Bulbeck,Jane Fleming,Robin Grant,Heidrun Golla,Roger Henriksson,Simon Kerrigan,Christine Marosi,Ingela Oberg,Stefan Oberndorfer,Kathy Oliver,H Roeline W Pasman,Emilie Le Rhun,Alasdair G Rooney,Roberta Rudà,Simone Veronese,Tobias Walbert,Michael Weller,Wolfgang Wick,Martin J B Taphoorn,Linda Dirven

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaa040

2020-07-16

Abstract:Abstract Background Brain tumor patients are at high risk of impaired medical decision-making capacity (MDC), which can be ethically challenging because it limits their ability to give informed consent to medical treatments or participation in research. The European Association of Neuro-Oncology Palliative Care Multidisciplinary Task Force performed a systematic review to identify relevant evidence with respect to MDC that could be used to give recommendations on how to cope with reduced MDC in brain tumor patients. Methods A literature search in several electronic databases was conducted up to September 2019, including studies with brain tumor and other neurological patients. Information related to the following topics was extracted: tools to measure MDC, consent to treatment or research, predictive patient- and treatment-related factors, surrogate decision making, and interventions to improve MDC. Results A total of 138 articles were deemed eligible. Several structured capacity-assessment instruments are available to aid clinical decision making. These instruments revealed a high incidence of impaired MDC both in brain tumors and other neurological diseases for treatment- and research-related decisions. Incapacity appeared to be mostly determined by the level of cognitive impairment. Surrogate decision making should be considered in case a patient lacks capacity, ensuring that the patient’s “best interests” and wishes are guaranteed. Several methods are available that may help to enhance patients’ consent capacity. Conclusions Clinical recommendations on how to detect and manage reduced MDC in brain tumor patients were formulated, reflecting among others the timing of MDC assessments, methods to enhance patients’ consent capacity, and alternative procedures, including surrogate consent.
Affect, Values and Problems Assessing Decision-Making Capacity

Jennifer Hawkins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2224273

Abstract:The dominant approach to assessing decision-making capacity in medicine focuses on determining the extent to which individuals possess certain core cognitive abilities. Critics have argued that this model delivers the wrong verdict in certain cases where patient values that are the product of mental disorder or disordered affective states undermine decision-making without undermining cognition. I argue for a re-conceptualization of what it is to possess the capacity to make medical treatment decisions. It is, I argue, the ability to track one's own personal interests at least as well as most people can. Using this idea, I demonstrate that it is possible to craft a solution for the problem cases-one that neither alters existing criteria in dangerous ways (e.g. does not open the door to various kinds of abuse) nor violates the spirit of widely accepted ethical constraints on decision-making assessment.
How do surrogates make treatment decisions for patients with dementia: An experimental survey study

Lauren Hersch Nicholas,Kenneth M. Langa,Scott D. Halpern,Mario Macis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4810

IF: 2.395

2024-02-17

Health Economics

Abstract:Despite the growing need for surrogate decision‐making for older adults, little is known about how surrogates make decisions and whether advance directives would change decision‐making. We conducted a nationally representative experimental survey that cross‐randomized cognitive impairment, gender, and characteristics of advance care planning among hospitalized older adults through a series of vignettes. Our study yielded three main findings: first, respondents were much less likely to recommend life‐sustaining treatments for patients with dementia, especially after personal exposure. Second, respondents were more likely to ignore patient preferences for life‐extending treatment when the patient had dementia, and choose unwanted life‐extending treatments for patients without dementia. Third, in scenarios where the patient's wishes were unclear, respondents were more likely to choose treatments that matched their own preferences. These findings underscore the need for improved communication and decision‐making processes for patients with cognitive impairment and highlight the importance of choosing a surrogate decision‐maker with similar treatment preferences.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services,economics
Intellectual Disabilities and Decision Making at End of Life: A Literature Review

Abbie Kirkendall,Kristen Linton,Saritha Farris

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12270

2016-07-25

Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Individuals with an intellectual disability are vulnerable to having end-of-life decisions made for them merely due to the presence of a disability. As a result, decisions made by others may not reflect the exact wishes of the individual.METHODS: This review examines literature on individuals with an intellectual disability in making end-of-life decisions from the years 2000 to 2014. A total of 38 articles were found with 12 articles having a direct focus on end-of-life decision making.RESULTS: The emerging themes include the following: (i) assumption of lack of capacity, (ii) inconsistency in evaluating capacity and communication challenges and (iii) third party decisions.CONCLUSIONS: Earlier discussions about end-of-life planning before the diagnosis of a life-limiting illness would be beneficial. Lacking is a consistent approach to determining capacity for individuals with an intellectual disability. The findings from this review provide a foundation for a decision tree in end-of-life decision making for individuals with an intellectual disability.

rehabilitation,psychology, educational
[Study participation in clozapine-resistant psychosis: a case study on decision-making capacity]

M den Toom,J B Zantvoord,A L Sutterland,J J Luykx,L M E Blanken,R Aarts,M B de Koning

Abstract:Informed consent is a requirement for medical research. Obtaining consent can be complex in patients with severe psychiatric disorders, often leading to their exclusion from study participation. Here, we discuss a case involving a patient with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia, highlighting the different perspectives of caregivers and physician-researchers, with an emphasis on decision-making capacity. The case illustrates the complexity of informed consent in this population, including the challenges in assessing decision-making capacity, ethical dilemmas, and potential improvements.<br />We conclude that improving existing standardized assessment tools, promoting inclusive approaches to research participation, and supporting patient representation in decision-making processes can contribute to the quality and integrity of medical research involving individuals with the most severe forms of psychiatric disorders.
The ability of persons with Alzheimer disease (AD) to make a decision about taking an AD treatment

J H.T. Karlawish,D J. Casarett,B D. James,S X. Xie,S Y.H. Kim,J.H.T. Karlawish,D. J. Casarett,B. D. James,S. X. Xie,S. Y.H. Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000160000.01742.9d

IF: 9.9

2005-05-09

Neurology

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To examine the severity of impairments in the decision-making abilities (understanding, appreciation, reasoning, and choice) and competency to make a decision to use an Alzheimer disease (AD)-slowing medication in patients with AD and the relationships between these impairments, insight, and overall cognition.METHODS: Semistructured in-home interviews were conducted with 48 patients with very mild to moderate AD and 102 family caregivers of patients with mild to severe AD recruited from the Memory Disorders Clinic of an AD center. The interview measured performance on the decision-making abilities and three expert psychiatrists' judgment of competency based on their independent review of the patient interviews.RESULTS: There was considerable variation in patients' performance on the measures of decision-making abilities. Three expert raters found 19 of 48 (40%) of the subjects competent. Competent patients were more likely to show awareness of their symptoms, prognosis, and diagnosis. A sensitivity analysis suggests that a MMSE score is helpful in discriminating capacity from incapacity only when below 19 or above 23.CONCLUSIONS: Persons with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease (AD) have notable impairments in their ability to make an AD treatment decision, especially persons with moderate AD and persons who lack awareness of symptoms, prognosis, or diagnosis.

clinical neurology
Communication and Decision Making About Life-Sustaining Treatment: Examining the Experiences of Resident Physicians and Seriously-Ill Hospitalized Patients

Kristy S. Deep,Charles H. Griffith,John F. Wilson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0779-6

IF: 5.7

2008-09-18

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract:BACKGROUNDDespite evidence-based recommendations for communication and decision making about life-sustaining treatment, resident physicians’ actual practice may vary. Few prior studies have examined these conversations qualitatively to uncover why ineffective communication styles may persist. OBJECTIVETo explore how discussions about life-sustaining treatment occur and examine the factors that influence physicians’ communicative practices in hopes of providing novel insight into how these processes can be improved.PARTICIPANTS AND APPROACHWe conducted and recorded 56 qualitative semi-structured interviews with participants from 28 matched dyads of a resident physician and a hospitalized patient or their surrogate decision maker with whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation was discussed. Transcripts were analyzed and coded using the constant comparative method to develop themes.MAIN RESULTSResident physicians introduced decisions about resuscitation in a scripted, depersonalized and procedure-focused manner. Decision makers exhibited a poor understanding of the decision they were being asked to make and resident physicians often disagreed with the decision. Residents did not advocate for a particular course of action; however, the discussions of resuscitation were framed in ways that may have implicitly influenced decision making.CONCLUSIONSResidents’ communication practices may stem from their attempt to balance an informed choice model of decision making with their interest in providing appropriate care for the patient. Physicians’ beliefs about mandatory autonomy may be an impediment to improving communication about patients’ choices for life-sustaining treatment. Redefining the role of the physician will be necessary if a shared decision making model is to be adopted.

medicine, general & internal,health care sciences & services
"Terminal Anorexia", Treatment Refusal and Decision-Making Capacity

Anneli Jefferson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963180124000367

2024-10-30

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

Abstract:Whether anorexic patients should be able to refuse treatment when this refusal potentially has a fatal outcome is a vexed topic. A recent proposal for a new category of "terminal anorexia" suggests criteria when a move to palliative care or even physician-assisted suicide might be justified. The author argues that this proposed diagnosis presents a false sense of certainty of the illness trajectory by conceptualizing anorexia in analogy with physical disorders and stressing the effects of starvation. Furthermore, this conceptualization is in conflict with the claim that individuals who meet the diagnostic criteria for terminal anorexia have decision-making capacity. It should therefore be rejected.

social sciences, biomedical,health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Decision making and neuropsychiatry

Shibley Rahman,Barbara J. Sahakian,Rudolf N. Cardinal,Robert D. Rogers,Trevor W. Robbins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01650-8

IF: 19.9

2001-06-01

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract:Abnormal decision making is a central feature of neuropsychiatric disorders. Recent investigations of the neural substrates underlying decision making have involved qualitative assessment of the cognition of decision making in clinical lesion studies (in patients with frontal lobe dementia) and neuropsychiatric disorders such as mania, substance abuse and personality disorders. A neural network involving the orbitofrontal cortex, ventral striatum and modulatory ascending neurotransmitter systems has been identified as having a fundamental role in decision making and in the neural basis of neuropsychiatric diseases. This network accounts for the dissociations among decision-making deficits in different clinical populations. Ultimately, a more refined and sophisticated characterization of such deficits might guide the early diagnosis and cognitive and therapeutic rehabilitation of these patients.

behavioral sciences,psychology, experimental,neurosciences
Decision-Making in the Admission of Older Patients: A Thematic Analysis From Multiple-Stakeholder Perspectives

Ryuichi Ohta,Toshihiro Yakabe,Chiaki Sano

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.51966

2024-01-09

Cureus

Abstract:Introduction As rural healthcare systems grapple with an aging population, understanding the factors influencing hospital admission decisions for elderly patients is crucial. This study explores the complex interplay of medical, social, and psychological factors that shape these decisions, as perceived by multiple stakeholders, including physicians, patients, and their families. Method This study was conducted in Unnan City Hospital, a rural community hospital in Unnan, Japan, using a qualitative thematic analysis approach. Participants included general physicians, patients admitted more than once, and their families. One-on-one semi-structured interviews were conducted in Japanese, recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. The analysis focused on identifying themes that influence decision-making processes regarding the admission of elderly patients. The research team, comprising family medicine, public health, and community health care experts, ensured a multi-perspective approach through collaborative coding and discussion. Results Three primary themes emerged from the analysis: "dilemma between medical indications and social admissions," "risks and benefits of hospitalization in response to unpredictable changes in the elderly," and "social factors intertwined with the multilayered nature of hospital admission decisions." Physicians reported a conflict between their medical training and the social needs of patients, often leading to stress and negative emotions. The unpredictable health trajectories of elderly patients necessitated a nuanced risk-benefit analysis for hospitalization. In addition, social factors, such as bed availability, patient's living environment, and psychosocial contexts, significantly influenced admission decisions. Conclusion The study highlights the need for a more holistic approach to medical education and practice, especially in rural healthcare settings. Recognizing the complexity of factors influencing hospitalization decisions, including medical, social, and individual patient circumstances, is vital. The findings underscore the importance of integrating biopsychosocial aspects into the decision-making process for the hospitalization of elderly patients, advocating for patient-centered care that respects the unique challenges in rural healthcare environments.
Do clinical and formal assessments of the capacity of patients in the intensive care unit to make decisions agree?

L M Cohen,J D McCue,G M Green

1993-11-08

Abstract:Background: The complex environment and technology of intensive care unit (ICU) care may impair the ability of patients to participate in medical decision making or give informed consent. We studied the agreement of the intuitive assessments of residents and nurses of ICU patients' cognition, judgment, and decision-making capacity, and whether those assessments agreed with abbreviated formal mental status testing. Methods: Using a prospective survey case study, we assessed 200 English-speaking patients within 24 hours of their ICU admission. Formal assessment of cognition, judgment, and insight was performed by a research assistant. We obtained independent intuitive ratings by nurses and residents of patient cognition, judgment, and ability to participate in medical decision making or give informed consent. Results: Residents' and nurses' assessment of cognition and judgment showed a high degree of agreement with weighted ks of greater than 0.76. Assessments of cognition by residents and nurses agreed with Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination in 70% and 73.6% of cases, respectively. Forty percent of the population had an unimpaired Mini-Mental State Examination score of greater than 23, and an additional 12% of the subjects were mildly impaired with scores of 20 to 23. When asked whether they would approach patient or family for consent for an invasive procedure, nurses and physicians said they would request informed consent from 66% and 62% of the patients, respectively. Conclusions: Residents and nurses caring for patients newly admitted to the ICU agree in their assessment of cognition, judgment, and capacity to participate in medical decision making, and are not unduly influenced by ventilator status. Their assessments correlate highly with abbreviated formal mental status testing.
Decision making and cancer.

Valerie F Reyna,Wendy L Nelson,Paul K Han,Michael P Pignone,Valerie F. Reyna,Wendy L. Nelson,Paul K. Han,Michael P. Pignone

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036834

IF: 16.358

2015-01-01

American Psychologist

Abstract:We review decision making along the cancer continuum in the contemporary context of informed and shared decision making in which patients are encouraged to take a more active role in their health care. We discuss challenges to achieving informed and shared decision making, including cognitive limitations and emotional factors, but argue that understanding the mechanisms of decision making offers hope for improving decision support. Theoretical approaches to decision making that explain cognition, emotion, and their interaction are described, including classical psychophysical approaches, dual-process approaches that focus on conflicts between emotion versus cognition (or reason), and modern integrative approaches such as fuzzy-trace theory. In contrast to the earlier emphasis on rote use of numerical detail, modern approaches emphasize understanding the bottom-line gist of options (which encompasses emotion and other influences on meaning) and retrieving relevant social and moral values to apply to those gist representations. Finally, research on interventions to support better decision making in clinical settings is reviewed, drawing out implications for future research on decision making and cancer.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Disagreement Between Clinicians and Score in Decision-Making Capacity of Critically Ill Patients

Pierre-Marie Bertrand,Bruno Pereira,Mireille Adda,Jean-François Timsit,Michel Wolff,Gilles Hilbert,Didier Gruson,Maïté Garrouste-Orgeas,Laurent Argaud,Jean-Michel Constantin,Russel Chabanne,Jean-Pierre Quenot,Julien Bohe,Claude Guerin,Laurent Papazian,Olivier Jonquet,Kada Klouche,Arnaud Delahaye,Beatrice Riu,Laurent Zieleskiewicz,Michaël Darmon,Elie Azoulay,Bertrand Souweine,Alexandre Lautrette

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003550

Abstract:Objectives: To compare the assessment of decision-making capacity of ICU patients by attending clinicians (physicians, nurses, and residents) with a capacity score measured by the Mini-Mental Status Examination, completed by Aid to Capacity Evaluation if necessary. The primary outcome was agreement between physicians' assessments and the score. Secondary outcomes were agreement between nurses' or residents' assessments and the score and identification of factors associated with disagreement. Design: A 1-day prevalence study. Setting: Nineteen ICUs in France. Subjects: All patients hospitalized in the ICU on the study day and the attending clinicians. Interventions: The decision-making capacity of patients was assessed by the attending clinicians and independently by an observer using the score. Measurements and main results: A total of 206 patients were assessed by 213 attending clinicians (57 physicians, 97 nurses, and 59 residents). Physicians designated more patients as having decision-making capacity (n = 92/206 [45%]) than score (n = 34/206 [17%]; absolute difference 28% [95% CI, 20-37%]; p = 0.001). There was a high disagreement between assessments of all clinicians and score (Kappa coefficient 0.39 [95% CI, 0.29-0.50] for physicians; 0.39 [95% CI, 0.27-0.52] for nurses; and 0.46 [95% CI, 0.35-0.58] for residents). The main factor associated with disagreement was a Glasgow Coma Scale score between 10 and 15 (odds ratio, 2.92 [1.18-7.19], p = 0.02 for physicians; 4.97 [1.50-16.45], p = 0.01 for nurses; and 3.39 [1.12-10.29], p = 0.03 for residents) without differentiating between the Glasgow Coma Scale scores from 10 to 15. Conclusions: The decision-making capacity of ICU patients was largely overestimated by all attending clinicians as compared with a score. The main factor associated with disagreement was a Glasgow Coma Scale score between 10 and 15, suggesting that clinicians confused consciousness with decision-making capacity.

Decision-Making for Hospitalized Incarcerated Patients Lacking Decisional Capacity

Decision-making among the Substitute Decision Makers in Intensive Care Units: an Investigation of Decision Control Preferences and Decisional Conflicts

Medical Decision Making in Correctional Facilities: Highlighting Gaps and Advocating for Policy Change

Decision making capacity for treatment in psychiatric inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Long-term, assenting psychiatric patients: decisional capacity and the quality of care

When a Patient Is at Foreseeable Risk of Losing Decisional and Functional Capacity

Transcultural Psychiatry in Medical Ethics: Assessing Decision-Making Capacity within the Lens of an East African Refugee

Dental decision-making under general anesthesia for patients with disabilities: A qualitative study

Determining medical decision-making capacity in brain tumor patients: why and how?

Affect, Values and Problems Assessing Decision-Making Capacity

How do surrogates make treatment decisions for patients with dementia: An experimental survey study

Intellectual Disabilities and Decision Making at End of Life: A Literature Review

[Study participation in clozapine-resistant psychosis: a case study on decision-making capacity]

The ability of persons with Alzheimer disease (AD) to make a decision about taking an AD treatment

Communication and Decision Making About Life-Sustaining Treatment: Examining the Experiences of Resident Physicians and Seriously-Ill Hospitalized Patients

"Terminal Anorexia", Treatment Refusal and Decision-Making Capacity

Decision making and neuropsychiatry

Decision-Making in the Admission of Older Patients: A Thematic Analysis From Multiple-Stakeholder Perspectives

Do clinical and formal assessments of the capacity of patients in the intensive care unit to make decisions agree?

Decision making and cancer.

Disagreement Between Clinicians and Score in Decision-Making Capacity of Critically Ill Patients