Abstract:Abstract Purpose Various alignment philosophies for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been described, all striving to achieve excellent long-term implant survival and good functional outcomes. In recent years, in search of higher functionality and patient satisfaction, a shift towards more tailored and patient-specific alignment is seen. The purpose of this study was to describe a restricted ‘inverse kinematic alignment’ (iKA) technique, and to compare clinical outcomes of patients that underwent robotic-assisted TKA performed by restricted iKA vs. adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA). Methods The authors reviewed the records of a consecutive series of patients that received robotic-assisted TKA with restricted iKA ( n = 40) and with aMA ( n = 40). Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and satisfaction on a visual analogue scale (VAS) were collected at a follow-up of 12 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds, and uni- and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine associations of OKS and satisfaction with six variables (age, sex, body mass index (BMI), preoperative hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle, preoperative OKS, alignment technique). Results The restricted iKA and aMA techniques yielded comparable outcome scores ( p = 0.069), with OKS, respectively, 44.6 ± 3.5 and 42.2 ± 6.3. VAS Satisfaction was better ( p = 0.012) with restricted iKA (9.2 ± 0.8) compared to aMA (8.5 ± 1.3). The number of patients that achieved OKS and satisfaction PASS thresholds was significantly higher ( p = 0.049 and p = 0.003, respectively) using restricted iKA (98% and 80%) compared to aMA (85% and 48%). Knees with preoperative varus deformity, achieved significantly ( p = 0.025) better OKS using restricted iKA (45.4 ± 2.0) compared to aMA (41.4 ± 6.8). Multivariable analyses confirmed better OKS ( β = 3.1; p = 0.007) and satisfaction ( β = 0.73; p = 0.005) with restricted iKA. Conclusions The results of this study suggest that restricted iKA and aMA grant comparable clinical outcomes at 12-month follow-up, though a greater proportion of knees operated by restricted iKA achieved the PASS thresholds for OKS and satisfaction. Notably. in knees with preoperative varus deformity, restricted iKA yielded significantly better OKS and satisfaction than aMA. Level of evidence Level III, comparative study.

Custom total knee arthroplasty with personalised alignment showed better 2‐year functional outcome compared to off‐the‐shelf arthroplasty

Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adults with Isolated Medial Osteoarthritis: A Matched Study Protocol.

High patient satisfaction with Customized Total Knee Arthroplasty at five year follow-up

Higher satisfaction and function scores in restricted kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment with medial pivot design total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomised controlled trial

Higher satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty using restricted inverse kinematic alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment

Outcomes in Patients with a Calipered Kinematically Aligned TKA That Already Had a Contralateral Mechanically Aligned TKA

Comparison of the Radiologic, Morphometric, and Clinical Outcomes between Kinematically and Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Matching Study

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Biomechanical Variables That May Be Related to Knee Functions Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Systematic review and meta-analysis of long term outcomes and innovations in Total Knee Arthroplasty: KINEMATIC, PERSONALIZED KNEE vs. CONVENTIONAL

Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a five-year prospective, multicentre, survivorship study

In Vivo Tibial Fit and Rotational Analysis of a Customized, Patient-Specific TKA versus Off-the-Shelf TKA

Equivalent Clinical Outcomes Between Anatomical Alignment Versus Mechanical Alignment of Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Posterior-Stabilized Prosthesis During an Average Follow-Up of Five Years: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

A clinical risk score enables early prediction of dissatisfaction 1 year after total knee arthroplasty

Restoration of the native tibial joint line obliquity in total knee arthroplasty with inverse kinematic alignment does not increase knee adduction moments

Excellent results of restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty at a minimum of 10 years of follow‐up

Large multiplanar changes to native alignment have no apparent impact on clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty

The influence of implant factors on patient outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty using a cemented single-radius, condylar-stabilized design performed without posterior cruciate ligament sacrifice

Individualised compared to off‐the‐shelf total knee arthroplasty results in lower and less variable patellar tilt

Implant design influences the joint-specific outcome after total knee arthroplasty

Superiority of kinematic alignment over mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty during medium‐ to long‐term follow‐up: A meta‐analysis and trial sequential analysis