Elucidating Microstructural Alterations in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Application of Advanced Diffusion‐Weighted Imaging in Children With Rasopathies

Julia R. Plank,Elveda Gozdas,Erpeng Dai,Chloe A. McGhee,Mira M. Raman,Tamar Green
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.70087
IF: 4.8
2024-12-14
Human Brain Mapping
Abstract:Differences in brain microstructure between neurodevelopmental disorders neurofibromatosis type‐1 (NF1) and Noonan syndrome (NS)were detected using neurite orientation density and dispersion imaging and diffusion‐kurtosis imaging. Differential decreases in neurite density (NDI) and mean kurtosis (MK) were found in each condition compared to age and sex matched typically developing (TD), particularly in the middle cerebellar peduncle. Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) can severely impact functioning yet effective treatments are limited. Greater insight into the neurobiology underlying NDDs is critical to the development of successful treatments. Using a genetics‐first approach, we investigated the potential of advanced diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) techniques to characterize the neural microstructure unique to neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and Noonan syndrome (NS). In this prospective study, children with NF1, NS, and typical developing (TD) were scanned using a multi‐shell DWI sequence optimized for neurite orientation density and dispersion imaging (NODDI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI). Region‐of‐interest and tract‐based analysis were conducted on subcortical regions and white matter tracts. Analysis of covariance, principal components, and linear discriminant analysis compared between three groups. 88 participants (Mage = 9.36, SDage = 2.61; 44 male) were included: 31 NS, 25 NF1, and 32 TD. Subcortical regions differed between NF1 and NS, particularly in the thalamus where the neurite density index (NDI; estimated difference 0.044 [95% CI: −0.034, 0.053], d = 2.36), orientation dispersion index (ODI; estimate 0.018 [95% CI: 0.010, 0.026], d = 1.39), and mean kurtosis (MK; estimate 0.049 [95% CI: 0.025, 0.072], d = 1.39) were lower in NF1 compared with NS (all p
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,neurosciences,neuroimaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?