Phase I trial of viral vector based personalized vaccination elicits robust neoantigen specific antitumor T cell responses

Anna Morena. D'Alise,Guido Leoni,Gabriella Cotugno,Loredana Siani,Rosa Vitale,Valentino Ruzza,Irene Garzia,Laura Antonucci,Elisa Micarelli,Veronica Venafra,Sven Gogov,Alessia Capone,Sarah Runswick,Juan Martin-Liberal,Emiliano Calvo,Victor Moreno,Stefan N. Symeonides,Elisa Scarselli,Oliver Bechter
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-3940
IF: 13.801
2024-03-22
Clinical Cancer Research
Abstract:Purpose: Personalized vaccines targeting multiple neoantigens (nAgs) are a promising strategy for eliciting a diversified antitumor T cell response to overcome tumor heterogeneity. NOUS-PEV is a vector based personalized vaccine, expressing 60 nAgs and consists of priming with a non-human Great Ape Adenoviral vector (GAd20) followed by boosts with Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA). Here, we report data of a phase Ib trial of NOUS-PEV in combination with pembrolizumab in treatment naïve metastatic melanoma patients (NCT04990479). Experimental Design: The feasibility of this approach was demonstrated by producing, releasing and administering to six patients 11 out of 12 vaccines within 8 weeks from biopsy collection to GAd20 administration. Results: The regimen was safe, with no treatment-related serious adverse events observed and mild vaccine-related reactions. Vaccine immunogenicity was demonstrated in all evaluable patients receiving the prime/boost regimen, with detection of robust neoantigen specific immune responses to multiple neoantigens comprising both CD4 and CD8 T cells. Expansion and diversification of vaccine-induced TCR clonotypes was observed in the post-treatment biopsies of patients with clinical response providing evidence of tumor infiltration by vaccine-induced neoantigen-specific T cell. Conclusions: These findings indicate the ability of NOUS-PEV to amplify and broaden the repertoire of tumor reactive T cells to empower a diverse, potent and durable antitumor immune response. Finally, a gene signature indicative for reduced presence of activated T cells together with very poor expression of the antigen processing machinery (APM) genes has been identified in pre-treatment biopsies as a potential biomarker of resistance to the treatment.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?