Abstract:China is emerging as an increasingly important player in the global development space, but may be less bound to compacts that aim to curb political preferencing and therefore may produce less yield in terms of impact toward Sustainable Development Goals. This research tests the hypothesis that the disproportionate aid allocation to the birth regions of the current African political leaders that applies to some sectors more than others.We applied a two-part model to first estimate the probability that a region receives an aid project. Then when at least one aid project is present in a leader's birth region, we estimated the mean amount of aid the region received.This analysis covers 699 subnational units (first administrative level) across 44 African countries over 2000–2014. These administrative units were compiled into a region year panel resulting in 10,485 observations.Birth regions of the current political leader are significantly more likely than the average of all of the regions to receive education (1.3 percentage points), social infrastructure and services (1.2 percentage points), and energy aid (1.7 percentage points). No significant association was found between aid flows to the birth region of the current political leader in the agriculture, communication, education, government, health or transportation sectors. Within the education sector, the coefficients for birth region are positive in both parts and statistically significant. Both the probability of aid allocation and the amount of aid conditional on any projects increase in the birth region of the current political leader.This sector-specific analysis provides a more nuanced picture of Chinese aid than previous analyses that determine the presence of political preference according to aggregate aid flows. The sectors where political preferencing exists are also those sectors that are typically associated with limited counterfactual-based program evaluation. We present evidence that demonstrates the importance of disaggregating aid flows in order to support a new policy framework designed to target the Sustainable Development Goals.

Regional favoritism in access to credit

Managerial Professional Connections Versus Political Connections: Evidence from Firms' Access to Informal Financing Resources

Political Connections And Loan Availability: Evidence From Chinese Private Firms

Political Favouritism and Investment Efficiency

Concierge treatment from banks: Evidence from the paycheck protection program

Politically connected firms and access to credit: Evidence from India

Cross-national differences in access to finance: Influence of culture and institutional environments

Politicians' Hometown Favouritism and Capital Resource Allocation

Local Officials and Regional FDI: An Empirical Study Based on Difference-in-Difference Estimation

Discrepancy and cross-regional bias in sovereign credit ratings: Analyzing the role of public debt

Cultural diversity and bank credit allocation

Bank Competition and Access to Finance: Evidence from African Countries

Pulling the purse strings: Are there sectoral differences in political preferencing of Chinese aid to Africa?

Political Institutions and Global Project Finance Loans

Regional Institutions Disparity,CEO Managerial Discretion and Firm Risk Taking:Evidence from China High-tech Firms across 30 Provinces

The effect of CEO locality on the cost of debt financing: the role of regional heterogeneity

The “home bias” of corporate subsidiary locations

Local Bank Financial Constraints and Firm Access to External Finance

Credit-rationing and entrepreneurial experience: Evidence from a resource deficit context

Implications of bank competition, financial stability, and gender gap on access to finance: Evidence from Sub‐Saharan Africa