Microvascular alterations of the ocular surface and retina in connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease
Li-Ming Chen,Min Kang,Jun-Yi Wang,San-Hua Xu,Cheng Chen,Hong Wei,Qian Ling,Liang-Qi He,Jie Zou,Yi-Xin Wang,Xu Chen,Ping Ying,Hui Huang,Yi Shao,Rui Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2024.10.14
2024-10-18
Abstract:Aim: To examine the disparities in macular retinal vascular density between individuals with connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) and healthy controls (HCs) by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and to investigate the changes in microvascular density in abnormal eyes. Methods: For a retrospective case-control study, a total of 16 patients (32 eyes) diagnosed with CTD-ILD were selected as the ILD group. The 16 healthy volunteers with 32 eyes, matched in terms of age and sex with the patients, were recruited as control group. The macular retina's superficial retinal layer (SRL) and deep retinal layer (DRL) were examined and scanned using OCTA in each individual eye. The densities of retinal microvascular (MIR), macrovascular (MAR), and total microvascular (TMI) were calculated and compared. Changes in retinal vascular density in the macular region were analyzed using three different segmentation methods: central annuli segmentation method (C1-C6), hemispheric segmentation method [uperior right (SR), superior left (SL), inferior left (IL), and inferior right (IR)], and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) methods [superior (S), inferior (I), left (L), and right (R)]. The data were analyzed using Version 9.0 of GraphPad prism and Pearson analysis. Results: The OCTA data demonstrated a statistically significant difference (P<0.05) in macular retinal microvessel density between the two groups. Specifically, in the SRL and DRL analyses, the ILD group exhibited significantly lower surface density of MIR and TMI compared to the HCs group (P<0.05). Furthermore, using the hemispheric segmentation method, the ILD group showed notable reductions in SL, SR, and IL in the superficial retina (P<0.05), as well as marked decreases in SL and IR in the deep retina (P<0.05). Similarly, when employing the ETDRS method, the ILD group displayed substantial drops in superficial retinal S and I (P<0.05), along with notable reductions in deep retinal L, I, and R (P<0.05). In the central annuli segmentation method, the ILD group exhibited a significant decrease in the superficial retinal C2-4 region (P<0.05), whereas the deep retina showed a notable reduction in the C3-5 region (P<0.05). Additionally, there was an observed higher positive likelihood ratio in the superficial SR region and deep MIR. Furthermore, there was a negative correlation between conjunctival vascular density and both deep and superficial retinal TMI (P<0.001). Conclusion: Patients with CTD-ILD exhibits a significantly higher conjunctival vascular density compared to the HCs group. Conversely, their fundus retinal microvascular density is significantly lower. Furthermore, CTD-ILD patients display notably lower superficial and deep retinal vascular density in comparison to the HCs group. The inverse correlation between conjunctival vascular density and both superficial and deep retinal TMI suggests that detecting subtle changes in ocular microcirculation could potentially serve as an early diagnostic indicator for connective tissue diseases, thereby enhancing disease management.