Abstract:Background: To compare surgical outcomes after mitral valve replacement via either minimally invasive thoracoscopic (MIs) or traditional median sternotomy (MS) surgery and determine the short- and mid-term clinical outcomes of the MI approach. Methods: All patients who received either MIs (n=405) or MS (n=691) mitral valve replacement surgery at the Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute between January 2012 and July 2015 were analyzed for outcome differences due to surgical approach using propensity score matching. The best 202 matches from the MI group and the MS group were analyzed. The clinical data of the two groups were collected, including preoperative cardiac function, operative data, postoperative complications, and follow-up. Results: A final total of 404 patients were included in this study after propensity score matching; the MIs group and the MS group each contained 202 patients. The two groups were similar in age, weight, pathological changes, and surgical approach. Compared with the MS group, the MIs group had a longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (P<0.001), aortic cross-clamping time (P<0.001), and total procedure time (P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding in-hospital mortality, stroke, pneumonia, acute renal failure, arrhythmia, and chylothorax. The MS group had significantly more patients with poor wound healing than the MIs group (P=0.004). The MI group had a lower rate of transfusion (P=0.037), shorter ventilation time (P=0.041), shorter ICU stay (P=0.033), reduced chest tube drainage and length of chest tube stay (P<0.001), and shorter hospital stay (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in hospital re-admission for bleeding, but the total hospitalization cost was higher in the MIs group (P=0.002). The mean follow-up was 26.59±12.33 months, the 1-year postoperative survival rate was 98.86%, and the overall survival rate was 97.44%. Compared with the MS group, the MIs group recovered earlier (P<0.05), and returned to work or study earlier (P<0.05). More patients in the MIs group were satisfied with the wound (P<0.001). The MS group had a higher incidence of postoperative osteomyelitis than the MIs group (P=0.028). There were no significant differences between groups in rates of mortality, stroke, pacemaker, reoperation, or 36-item Short Form Health Survey score. Conclusions: Compared with the MS approach, the MIs method of mitral valve replacement has longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time; however, it does not increase the risk of mortality and complications. Furthermore, MIs causes less trauma, fewer transfusions, less wound infection, faster recovery, faster return to work or study, and greater satisfaction with the incision in the mid-term. MI cardiac surgery is safe, effective, and feasible.

Minimally Invasive Isolated Tricuspid Valve Surgery: Late Outcome From A Multicenter Study

A Less Invasive Approach for Better Outcomes

Mid-term outcomes of isolated tricuspid valve surgery according to preoperative clinical and functional staging

Minimally Invasive Isolated Tricuspid Valve Repair after Left-Sided Valve Surgery: A Single-Center Experience.

Outcomes of minimally invasive isolated tricuspid valve reoperation after left-side valve surgery: A single-center experience

[Surgical treatment of isolated tricuspid valve disease: indications, new evidence, and risk stratification]

Isolated Reoperation for Tricuspid Regurgitation after Left-Sided Valve Surgery: Technique Evolution

Minimally Invasive Valve Replacement for Late Tricuspid Regurgitation after Left-Sided Valve Surgery

Early Results Of Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Via Partial Sternotomy Or Right Thoracotomy: Insights In Acute Kidney Injury

Novel Techniques and Technologies for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Large Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Early and Mid-Term Outcomes of Isolate Mitral Valve Repair Through Minimal Invasive Versus Median Sternotomy Ap-Proach: a Propensity-Matched Analysis

Comparative Evaluation of the Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery vs. Full Sternotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Propensity Score-Matched Studies

Mitral valve replacement via minimally invasive totally thoracoscopic surgery versus traditional median sternotomy: a propensity score matched comparative study

Outcomes of Isolated Tricuspid Valve Surgery: A Society of Thoracic Surgeons Analysis and Risk Model

Long-term outcomes of mini-sternotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a randomized controlled trial

Benefit of isolated surgical valve repair or replacement for functional tricuspid regurgitation and long-term outcomes stratified by the TRI-SCORE

Combined Mitral And Aortic Valve Procedure Via Right Mini-Thoracotomy Versus Full Median Sternotomy Insights From A Single-Center Study Of Propensity-Matched Data

Tricuspid Valve Replacement: An Analysis of Risk Factors and Outcomes

Benefits Of A Right Anterolateral Minithoracotomy Rather Than A Median Sternotomy In Isolated Tricuspid Redo Procedures

Navigating the challenges of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a risk analysis and learning curve evaluation

Transcatheter bicaval valve system for the treatment of severe isolated tricuspid regurgitation. Features from a single-Centre experience