Abstract:The timing of tracheostomy for critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation (MV) is a topic of controversy. Our objective was to determine the most suitable timing for tracheostomy in patients undergoing MV.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is determining the optimal timing for performing a tracheotomy in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV). Specifically, the study aims to evaluate the impact of early, intermediate, and late tracheotomy on hospital stay, ICU stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and prognosis, and to investigate whether delayed tracheotomy is associated with a higher risk of mortality.
### Research Background
Critically ill patients may require mechanical ventilation support for various reasons (such as pneumonia, trauma, central nervous system injury, infection, and acute respiratory distress syndrome). Although endotracheal intubation is the most commonly used method to initiate mechanical ventilation, it has some drawbacks, such as patient discomfort, risk of tube dislodgement, and difficulty in secretion drainage. Therefore, an increasing number of long-term mechanically ventilated patients undergo tracheotomy. Tracheotomy can reduce oral and laryngeal injury, lower the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia, improve patient comfort, reduce the use of sedatives, enhance patient mobility and feeding ability, and help patients leave the ICU and be discharged earlier. However, tracheotomy is an invasive procedure and carries certain risks of complications. Therefore, physicians need to weigh the pros and cons when deciding the timing of tracheotomy.
### Research Objective
The primary objective of this study is to determine the optimal timing for performing a tracheotomy in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation through a retrospective cohort study. The study hypothesizes that delayed tracheotomy may prolong hospital stay and ICU stay, increase mechanical ventilation duration, and potentially lead to worse prognosis.
### Methods
The research team collected clinical data from 1,884 patients who underwent tracheotomy at a tertiary hospital in China from January 2011 to December 2020. Patients were divided into three groups based on the time from endotracheal intubation to tracheotomy: early tracheotomy (ET), intermediate tracheotomy (IMT), and late tracheotomy (LT). The study used two grouping criteria:
- Criterion I: ET ≤ 5 days, 5 days < IMT ≤ 10 days, LT > 10 days
- Criterion II: ET ≤ 7 days, 7 days < IMT ≤ 14 days, LT > 14 days
By comparing parameters such as hospital stay, ICU stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and sedation duration among the groups, the study evaluated the impact of different tracheotomy timings on patient prognosis. Additionally, a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted to determine whether delayed tracheotomy increases the risk of mortality.
### Results
The study found that, regardless of the grouping criteria used, patients with delayed tracheotomy (LT) had significantly longer hospital stays, ICU stays, mechanical ventilation durations, and sedation durations. Furthermore, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that late tracheotomy was independently associated with worse prognosis. However, early tracheotomy (ET) did not show significant clinical benefits compared to intermediate tracheotomy (IMT).
### Conclusion
In a mixed ICU population, delayed tracheotomy prolonged ICU and hospital stays, increased mechanical ventilation duration and sedation duration, and led to worse prognosis. Therefore, for patients likely to require long-term mechanical ventilation, tracheotomy should be performed within 10 days after endotracheal intubation. This not only helps improve patient prognosis but also reduces the consumption of medical resources, enhances patient comfort, and improves recovery outcomes. However, early tracheotomy did not show more advantages over intermediate tracheotomy.