Abstract:Purpose We aim at developing a model‐based algorithm that compensates for the effect of both pulse pileup (PP) and charge sharing (CS), and evaluate the performance using computer simulations. Methods The proposed PCP algorithm for PP and CS compensation cascaded models for CS and PP we previously developed, maximizes Poisson log‐likelihood, and uses an efficient 3‐step exhaustive search. For comparison, we also developed LCP algorithm that combines models for a loss of counts (LC) and CS. Two types of computer simulation, slab‐based and CT‐based, were performed to assess the performance of both PCP and LCP with 200 mA and 800 mA, (300 μm)2 x 1.6 mm cadmium telluride detector, and a deadtime of 23 ns. A slab‐based assessment used a pair of adipose and iodine with different thicknesses, attenuated x‐rays, assessed the bias and noise of the outputs from one detector pixel; a CT‐based assessment simulated a chest/cardiac scan and a head‐and‐neck scan using 3‐D phantom and noisy cone‐beam projections. Results With the slab simulation, the PCP had little or no biases when the expected counts was sufficiently large, even though a probability of count loss (PCL) due to deadtime loss or pulse pileup was as high as 0.8. In contrast, the LCP had significant biases (>±2 cm of adipose) when the PCL was higher than 0.15. Biases were present with both PCP and LCP when the expected counts were less than 10–120 per datum, which was attributed to the fact that the maximum‐likelihood did not approach the asymptote. The noise of PCP was within 8% from Cramér–Rao lower bounds for most cases, when no significant bias was present. The two CT studies essentially agreed with the slab simulation study. PCP had little or no biases in the estimated basis line integrals, reconstructed basis density maps, and synthesized monoenergetic CT images. But the LCP had significant biases in basis line integrals when x‐ray beams passed through lungs and near the body and neck contours, where the PCL were above 0.15. As a consequence, basis density maps and monoenergetic CT images obtained by LCP had biases throughout the imaged space. Conclusion We have developed the PCP algorithm that uses the PP–CS model. When the expected counts were more than 10–120 per datum, the PCP algorithm was statistically efficient and successfully compensates for the effect of the spectral distortion due to both PP and CS providing little or no biases in basis line integrals, basis density maps, and monoenergetic CT images regardless of count‐rates. In contrast, the LCP algorithm, which models a loss of count due to pileup, produces severe biases when incident count‐rates are high and the PCL is 0.15 or higher. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Corrections to "Multilayer Perception Model Versus Charge Comparison Method for Neutron/Gamma Discrimination in Plastic Scintillator According to Sampling Frequency and Energy Radiation"

Correcting for neutron width fluctuations in Hauser-Feshbach gamma branching ratios

MONTE CARLO CALCULATION AND COMPARISON OF GAMMA/NEUTRON DISCRIMINABILITY OF SOME SCINTILLATORS

A Count Correction Method for Multistage Dead Time in Gamma-Ray Spectrometry

Monte Carlo Method for Calculating Particle Radiation Detector Correction Factors

Pile-Up Correction for Inelastic Gamma-Ray Detection in Pulsed Fast Neutron Analysis

Simulation Study of the Neutron–gamma Discrimination Capability of a Liquid Scintillator Neutron Detector

Multivariate Gaussian Model Based Cramér-Rao Lower Bound Evaluation of the In-Depth PCXD

Modelling the Response of CLLBC(Ce) and TLYC(Ce) SiPM-Based Radiation Detectors in Mixed Radiation Fields with Geant4

Corrections for the Geometric Distortion of the Tube Detectors on SANS Instruments at ORNL

Computational model for detector timing effects in Compton-camera based prompt-gamma imaging for proton radiotherapy

The Multigaussian method: a new approach to multichannel radiochromic film dosimetry

Material Properties of Popular Radiation Detection Scintillator Crystals for Optical Physics Transport Modelling in Geant4

Erratum: Initial fields and instability in the classical model of the heavy-ion collision

Summing Coincidence Correction for Γ-Ray Measurements Using the HPGe Detector with a Low Background Shielding System

A Review of Neutron–Gamma-Ray Discrimination Methods Using Organic Scintillators

Modeling gamma detectors in OpenMC: Validation of a newly implemented pulse-height tally

A comparison of the neutron detection efficiency and response characteristics of two pixelated PSD-capable organic scintillator detectors with different photo-detection readout methods

Model‐based pulse pileup and charge sharing compensation for photon counting detectors: A simulation study

Uncertainties of calculated coincidence-summing correction factors in gamma-ray spectrometry

A study on “position-energy” response correction method based on monolithic crystal coupled SiPM array