Association between exposure to airborne particulate matter less than 2.5 μm and human fecundity in China

Qin Li,Danni Zheng,Yuanyuan Wang,Rong Li,Hongping Wu,Suxin Xu,Yuefan Kang,Yunxia Cao,Xiujuan Chen,Yimin Zhu,Shuguang Xu,Zi-Jiang Chen,Ping Liu,Jie Qiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106231
IF: 11.8
2021-01-01
Environment International
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>Whether exposure to airborne particulate matter less than 2.5 μm (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) could impact human fecundity is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the potential impact of PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure on time to pregnancy (TTP) and the prevalence of infertility in the general Chinese population.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Method</h3><p>We collected reproductive information, sociodemographic characteristics, and lifestyle data of 10,211 couples at risk of pregnancy from a large-scale community-based fertility survey in China. Then, we estimated each participant's 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year average PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure levels based on remote sensing information. After adjusting for demographic, lifestyle, and environmental co-variables, discrete-time Cox regression models were used to estimate the fecundability odds ratio (FOR) per 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup> change of PM<sub>2.5</sub>. We also estimated the odds ratio (OR) of infertility per 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup> change of PM<sub>2.5</sub>, using logistic regression models.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Findings</h3><p>Among the 10,211 couples, 6,875 (67%) had conceived spontaneously, with a median TTP of 5 months (interquartile range: 2–10 months). The median PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure was 56.8 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, with a wide range of 9.2–93.5 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. In Cox regression models, each increase of 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup> in the 1-year average PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure was associated with a significant decrease in fecundity by 11% (FOR: 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86–0.92). In logistic regression models, it was also associated with an 20% increased likelihood of infertility (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.13–1.27).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure was associated with reduced human fecundity, presented by a longer TTP and higher odds of infertility, which might explain the increased infertility rates in areas with heavy PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution.</p>
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?