Abstract:Sexual dimorphism is typically explained by sexual selection, yet other potential drivers frequently remain untested. I examine whether Southern red bishop, Euplectes orix, hosts of the brood parasitic diederik cuckoo, Chrysococcyx caprius, differentially detect, and/or discriminate between, the male and female forms of their brood parasite. Using experimental intrusions at hosts' nests, I found no evidence that diederik cuckoos differ in detectability, and hosts were also indiscriminately aggressive toward nest intruders. However, hosts that witnessed a male diederik cuckoo model during the trial were more likely to reject odd eggs. Together, these findings suggest that the more cryptic appearance of female diederik cuckoos is beneficial given the egg rejection costs associated with conspicuous male‐like intruders at the nest. The female diederik cuckoo (left) exhibits less conspicuous plumage and facial colouration than the male (right; photography by Dominic Cram and Jenny York). The existence of adult sexual dimorphism is typically explained as a consequence of sexual selection, yet coevolutionary drivers of sexual dimorphism frequently remain untested. Here, I investigate the role of sexual dimorphism in host–parasite interactions of the brood parasitic diederik cuckoo, Chrysococcyx caprius. Female diederik cuckoos are more cryptic in appearance and pose a threat to the clutch, while male diederik cuckoos are conspicuous and not a direct threat. Specifically, I examine whether sexual dimorphism in diederik cuckoos provokes threat‐level sensitive responses in Southern red bishop, Euplectes orix, hosts. I use experimentally simulated nest intrusions to test whether hosts have the capacity to differentially (i) detect, and/or (ii) discriminate between, male and female diederik cuckoos, relative to harmless controls. Overall, I found no evidence that diederik cuckoos differ in detectability, since both sexes are comparable to controls in the probability and speed of host detection. Furthermore, neither male nor female hosts discriminate between sexually dimorphic diederik cuckoos when engaging in frontline nest defences. However, hosts that witnessed a male diederik cuckoo during the trial were more likely to reject odd eggs. Moreover, experimental eggs were significantly more likely to be rejected when female bishops observed a male compared to a female diederik cuckoo. While the cryptic appearance of female diederik cuckoos does not reduce detection by hosts, it does provide the benefit of anonymity given the egg rejection costs of conspicuous male‐like appearance in the nest vicinity. These findings have implications for the evolution and maintenance of sexual dimorphism across the Cuculidae, and highlight the value of testing assumptions about the ecological drivers of sexual dimorphism.

Video evidence that cuckoos farm their hosts by ejecting nestlings

Common cuckoo female host selection is not determined by host quality but can affect cuckoo nestling growth when parasitising Common redstarts

Parasitic begging calls of nestmate-evictor common cuckoos stimulate more parental provisions by red-winged blackbirds than calls of nest-sharing brown-headed cowbirds

Can nest design hinder brood parasitism success?

Seasonal increase in nest defense, but not egg rejection, in a cuckoo host

Three sympatric host nestlings eavesdrop on cuckoo nestling distress calls

Mobbing behaviour of hosts and non-hosts towards cuckoo Cuculus canorus of different sex

From Parasitism to Mutualism: Unexpected Interactions Between a Cuckoo and Its Host

Female Cuckoo Calls Deceive Their Hosts by Evoking Nest-Leaving Behavior: Variation under Different Levels of Parasitism

Egg rejection changes with seasonal variation in risk of cuckoo parasitism in Daurian redstarts, Phoenicurus auroreus

Brood parasitism and egg recognition in three bunting hosts of the cuckoos

Defense behavior of two closely related but geographically distant host species against cuckoo parasitism: A next test for the parallel coevolution

Host nest defence does not act as selective agent against plumage polymorphism in brood parasites

Brood parasitism and host-parasite relationships: Cuckoos adapt to reduce the time of hatching ahead of host nestlings by increasing egg thickness

Foreign egg retention by avian hosts in repeated brood parasitism: why do rejecters accept?

Intensive Nest Predation by Crabs Produces Source–sink Dynamics in Hosts and Parasites

Observation of interspecific feeding by White‐browed Shrike‐Babbler (Pteruthius aeralatus) of brood‐parasitic nestlings of Chestnut‐winged Cuckoo (Clamator coromandus) in a Nest of Greater Necklaced Laughingthrush (Pterorhinus pectoralis)

Can social interactions rescue “lost” behavioural defences in an allopatric cuckoo host?

Proximate Mechanisms of Earlier Hatching in Parasitic Cuckoos: Yolk Energy and Embryonic Metabolism

Naïve hosts of avian brood parasites accept foreign eggs, whereas older hosts fine-tune foreign egg discrimination during laying

Costly conspicuousness reveals benefits of sexual dimorphism in brood parasitic diederik cuckoos