Abstract:Pursuing a merger or acquisition is inherently difficult. Things get even harder when executives are blind to their own faulty assumptions, say Lovallo--a professor at the University of Western Australia Business School and a senior adviser to McKinsey--and three of his McKinsey colleagues. The authors identify biases that can surface at each step of the M&A process and provide practical tips for rising above them--an approach they call targeted debiasing. During the preliminary due-diligence stage, biases abound. To overcome the confirmation bias, aggressively seek evidence that challenges your initial hypothesis about a deal. The best medicine for overconfidence in identifying revenue and cost synergies is to learn from precedents at your firm and others. Avoiding underestimation of cultural differences between your company and the target requires understanding the differences in the ways people interact at each organization. Misjudging the time and resources you need is at the core of the planning fallacy, which you can elude by formally identifying best practices and continually revisiting them. Finally, dilute conflict of interest by soliciting dispassionate external expertise. The bidding phase is vulnerable to the winner's curse, a phenomenon common in auctions. To avoid paying too much for a target, actively generate alternatives to the deal under consideration and develop a set of bidding cutoff rules. After offering an initial bid, deal makers are susceptible to anchoring, whereby they remain attached to their original price estimate, and to the sunk cost fallacy that they've invested too much to stop now. The secret to overcoming both: Use your newly available access to the target's books to better assess the investment case--and change your tune accordingly.

Relationship Advisors Guiding Financially Weak Targets in M&A Deals: Conflict of Interest and Reputation Concerns

The Overpaid Targets and the Regulation of Entry——A Case Study on Morgan Stanley Acquires Nan Tong Bank

Personal connections, financial advisors and M&A outcomes

Debt Issues around Mergers & Acquisitions

Bank Dependence and Bank Financing in Corporate M&A.

Financial advisor's covert discrimination against long-term clients

The Disciplinary Role of Financial Statements: Evidence from Mergers and Acquisitions of Privately Held Targets

Merger Waves and the Importance of Financial Advisors Reputation for Acquirers

Expert Advice: Industry Expertise of M&A Advisors and Acquirer Shareholder Returns

Do Banks Monitor Corporate Decisions? - Evidence from Bank Financing of Mergers and Acquisitions

Financial Vs. Strategic Buyers

The effect of auditor's cooperation with independent financial advisors on the reliability of performance commitment-Based on the moderating effect of managerial overconfidence

Consulting Multiple Advisors: When It Hurts and When It Does Not Hurt the Advisor–Advisee Relationship?

Maturity Mismatches of Chinese Listed Firms

Strategic Alliances and Lending Relationships

Deals without delusions

Directors and officers liability insurance and the wealth effect of M&A announcements

Premier Advisory Services for VIP Acquirers

Exploring Mergers and Acquisitions in Public Accounting

Financial constraints and synergy gains from mergers and acquisitions

Personal Finance Decisions with Untruthful Advisors: an Agent-Based Model