Structure and scaling of the middle ear in domestic dog breeds

Matthew J. Mason,Madaleine A. Lewis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.14049

2024-04-13

Journal of Anatomy

Abstract:Middle ear structural dimensions in dog breeds are more closely correlated with skull length than width. Although they scale with negative allometry, the St Bernard's middle ear cavity is still 14 times larger than that of a Chihuahua. Surprisingly, these substantial size differences are not reflected in existing canine audiograms. Although domestic dogs vary considerably in both body size and skull morphology, behavioural audiograms have previously been found to be similar in breeds as distinct as a Chihuahua and a St Bernard. In this study, we created micro‐CT reconstructions of the middle ears and bony labyrinths from the skulls of 17 dog breeds, including both Chihuahua and St Bernard, plus a mongrel and a wolf. From these reconstructions, we measured middle ear cavity and ossicular volumes, eardrum and stapes footplate areas and bony labyrinth volumes. All of these ear structures scaled with skull size with negative allometry and generally correlated better with condylobasal length than with maximum or interaural skull widths. Larger dogs have larger ear structures in absolute terms: the volume of the St Bernard's middle ear cavity was 14 times that of the Chihuahua. The middle and inner ears are otherwise very similar in morphology, the ossicular structure being particularly well‐conserved across breeds. The expectation that larger ear structures in larger dogs would translate into hearing ranges shifted towards lower frequencies is not consistent with the existing audiogram data. Assuming that the audiograms accurately reflect the hearing of the breeds in question, oversimplifications in existing models of middle ear function or limitations imposed by other parts of the auditory system may be responsible for this paradox.

anatomy & morphology