Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the value of ultrasound in the diagnosis of anterosuperior acetabular labral tear.METHODS:A total of 102 patients [(42 males and 60 females, age from 13 to 60 years, average age was (35.14±9.16) years] with suspected anterosuperior acetabular labral tear were included in this study, including 44 left hip joints and 58 right hip joints. All the patients received hip joint ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation before arthroscopy surgery. Using arthroscopy as golden standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy between ultrasound and MRI were calculated and compared.RESULTS:There were 91 antero-superior acetabular labral tears of 102 patients which were confirmed during arthroscopy surgery. Sixty-nine patients were diagnosed correctly by ultrasound, including 60 anterosuperior acetabular labral tears and 9 with no acetabular labral tears, whereas 2 were false-positive and 31 were found to be false-negative. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy by ultrasound were respectively 65.93%, 81.82%, 96.77%, 22.50% and 67.65%. In contrast, seventy-seven patients were diagnosed correctly by MRI, including 70 anterosuperior acetabular labral tears and 7 with no acetabular labral tears, whereas 4 were false-positive and 21 were found to be false-negative. For MRI, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were respectively 76.92%, 63.64%, 94.59%, 25.00% and 75.49%. The results of ultrasound and MRI were in accordance in 68 of the 102 patients. There were 51 anterosuperior acetabular labral tears of the 68 patients who were diagnosed by both ultrasound and MRI, whereas there were 17 with no acetabular labral tears of the 68 patients who were diagnosed by both ultrasound and MRI. The results of ultrasound and MRI were inconsistent in 34 of the 102 patients. In 11 of the 34 patients, in which case ultrasound diagnosed anterosuperior acetabular labral tear, MRI found no acetabular labral tear. Whereas, in 23 of the 34 patients, in which case MRI diagnosed anterosuperior acetabular labral tear, ultrasound found no acetabular labral tear. As compared with MRI findings, ultrasound had a lower accuracy for anterosuperior acetabular labral tear than MRI, there was statistical difference on the accuracy for anterosuperior acetabular labral tear (P<0.01).CONCLUSION:Although ultrasound had a slightly lower sensitivity for anterosuperior acetabular labral tear, it had a higher specificity than MRI. Dynamic evaluation of antero-superior acetabular labral tear is an advantage of ultrasound. Ultrasound could be used as a feasible method to evaluate anterosuperior acetabular labral tear.

Ultrasound had high accuracy in measuring hip joint capsule thickness

Accuracy Limits for the Thickness Measurement of the Hip Joint Cartilage in 3-D MR Images: Simulation and Validation

An Analysis Algorithm for Accurate Determination of Articular Cartilage Thickness of Hip Joint from MR Images.

Ultrasound versus ultrasound and MRI for diagnosis of hip joint effusion

Imaging evaluation of hip capsule disorders: a comprehensive review

The Feasibility of Ultrasound Graf Method in Screening Infants and Young Children with Congenital Hip Dysplasia and Follow-Up of Treatment Effect

Effectiveness of Ultrasound Guidance on Intraarticular and Periarticular Joint Injections

Capsular thinning on magnetic resonance arthrography is associated with intra-operative hip joint laxity in women

Ultrasound and Ultrasound-Guided Hip Injection Have High Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Femoroacetabular Impingement with Atypical Symptoms

[Application of Ultrasound for Evaluation of Anterosuperior Acetabular Labral Tear].

Healing of joint capsule after hip arthroscopy using interportal capsulotomy and capsular closure influences clinical outcomes

Consistency of Indices Obtained Via Hip Medial Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Reduction and Spica Cast Treatment for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Computer-Aided System Application Value for Assessing Hip Development

Value of high-frequency ultrasound and X-ray in diagnosing knee osteoarthritis: a comparative study

A Measurement Method of Knee Joint Space Width by Ultrasound: a Large Multicenter Study.

Relationship Between Hip Capsular Thickness and Instability After Previous Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Matched-Cohort Analysis

Is hip capsule morphology associated with hip pain in patients without another structural correlate?

Evaluation of the Morphology and Function of Medial Collateral Ligament after Total Knee Arthroplasty with High-frequency Ultrasound

Quantitative Evaluation of Hip Muscle Atrophy in Patients with Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Ultrasound of the adult hip

Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Acetabular Chondral Delamination in Femoroacetabular Impingement.