Abstract:Introduction The biopsychosocial model is generally considered the current gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of sexual disorders (Rullo et al, 2016). Shortcomings in how clinicians apply it remain. Given the model's importance to our field, we must periodically re-examine ways to optimize its strengths and minimize misapplication. This presentation encourages all to examine our understanding and application of the model so it remains adequately inclusive and robust for diagnosis and treatment. Doing so will remind clinicians of how they already use it productively but will also alert them to potential "blind spots" resulting from their specialized training and practice cultivated within their professions of origin. The biopsychosocial model must be a "stand-in" for all the predisposing, precipitating, and maintaining biological, medical/surgical, cognitive, behavioral, emotional, social, and cultural factors involved in the etiology and treatment of sexual disorders. The relevant aspects of those factors are best understood at a granular detail level that recognizes their proportional contribution to a given individual's sexual response. Most clinicians pay lip service to using a biopsychosocial approach, but too frequently, there is an overly exclusive focus on one or two aspects of the model, with insufficient awareness of other contributing factors. How many sex therapists offering diagnosis and treatment worldwide (typically aware of psychosocial nuances) are conversant with the impact of the biomedical diagnostic and treatment advances for cancers and chronic diseases, which may extend life but often result in diminished sexual function and satisfaction? How many know the latest benchwork discoveries and investigative techniques that improve understanding of drug interactions and mechanisms illuminating etiology? Reciprocally, do most physicians attend to the many cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and cultural factors contributing to or exacerbating a sexual disorder? How many physicians, when prescribing, inquire of the patient (or their partner) if the patient's goals for sexual activity are aligned with those of their partner? Physicians who prefer broader assessment find time limitations negating the potential for multilayered engagement. Finally, how many of us provide competent cultural awareness and sensitivity when evaluating and treating our patients? Telehealth is accelerating global access to patients, which creates an ever-increasing need for practitioner sensitivity to patient population differences. Many subscribe to a multidisciplinary model, whether working alone or in a team setting, but siloed thinking is still reinforced. There is increasing collegial respect, but perspectives remain separated. Therefore, it becomes incumbent upon all to mindfully seek continuing education opportunities (offered by our professional societies, etc.) to fill in the gaps we must recognize in our expertise. In applying our model, we must aspire to include recognition of all relevant factors, in effect leading to more comprehensive care while retaining the ease of use of the term "biopsychosocial." Objective Given the biopsychosocial model's importance to our field, we must periodically re-examine ways to optimize its strengths and minimize misapplication. Methods Expert opinion commentary. Results There are shortcomings in how clinicians apply the biopsychosocial model. Conclusions We must aspire to recognize and appreciate all relevant etiologic and treatment factors when applying our model, leading to more comprehensive care and greater patient and clinician satisfaction. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Palatin, Sprout, Pfizer, Roman, Mediflix, Kanna.

A Biopsychosocial Framework for Sport Science: "A Jack of All Trades Is Oftentimes Better Than a Master of One"

The biopsychosocial model – history, controversy and Engel

Human Sciences, Sport Sciences, and the Need to Study People “In the Round”

Towards a Biopsychosocial Psychiatry.

Looking forward to a decade of the biopsychosocial model

The biopsychosocial model is lost in translation: from misrepresentation to an enactive modernization

The biopsychosocial model of illness: a model whose time has come

Science, Knowledge, and Sport Psychology

Sport Psychology: Principles and Practices for Sports Medicine Physicians

(356) Reframing The Bio-psychosocial Model. For Sexual Medicine

George Engel's Epistemology of Clinical Practice

Athlete Health and Human Performance Will Not Improve Without Transdisciplinary Collaboration and Data Sharing in Elite Sport

(079) Encouraging A Greater Awareness Of All Relevant Factors When Sexual Medicine And Sex Therapy Clinicians Apply The Biopsychosocial Model

Using the Biopsychosocial Model to Guide Patient-Centered Neurological Treatments.

Psychosocial aspects of sports medicine in pediatric athletes: Current concepts in the 21st century

Let's Talk About Mental Health and Mental Disorders in Elite Sports: A Narrative Review of Theoretical Perspectives

Current Clinical Concepts: Integration of Psychologically Informed Practice for Management of Patients With Sport-Related Injuries

Sports Psychiatry: Assuring a Diverse Workforce in an Area of Increasing Professional Interest

A reflection on systems thinking as a research tool in sport and exercise science

The biopsychosocial model: Its use and abuse

The Psychological and Social Benefits of Sport and Physical Activity