Abstract:Cancer progression involves biomechanical changes within transformed cells and the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM). The viscoelastic features of fluidity and elasticity that are based on a novel Kelvin–Voigt fractional derivative (KVFD) model were found capable of discriminating normal, benign and malignant breast biopsy tissues on the cellular scale. The improved specificity of KVFD model parameters derives from greater accuracy of fitting the entire approaching force-indentation measurement curve (\(R^{2}\) > 0.99) compared with traditional elastic models (\(R^{2}\) < 0.86). Moreover, model parameters can be interpreted in terms of histopathological features. First, statistical comparisons reveal there are significant differences (p < 0.001) in elasticity E0, fluidity \(\alpha\), and viscosity \(\tau\) among healthy, benign, and malignant groups. Malignant breast tissues show low-value, broad-distributions in E0 and with high fluidity \(\alpha\) as compared with healthy and benign tissues. Second, histograms of E0 and \(\alpha\) provide distinctive features by fitting to Gaussian mixture (GM) models. The histograms of E0 and \(\alpha\) are best fit by two kernels GM for malignant tissues, indicating that the cells are soft but with high fluidity and the ECM is stiff but with low fluidity. However, the data suggest one-kernel GM model for benign tissue and a patched uniform distribution for healthy tissue. Third, using fluidity \(\alpha\) as the test statistic, the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) is 0.701 ± 0.012 (p < 0.0001) for control versus malignant and 0.706 ± 0.013 (p < 0.0001) for benign versus malignant group. Variations in tissue fluidity and elasticity offer a concise set of viscoelastic biomarkers that correlate well with histopathological features.

Viscoelastic parameters of invasive breast cancer in correlation with porous structure and elemental analysis data

Quantitative diagnosis of breast tumors by characterization of viscoelastic behavior of healthy breast tissue

Characterizing viscoelastic properties of breast cancer tissue in a mouse model using indentation

Linking Metastatic Potential and Viscoelastic Properties of Breast Cancer Spheroids via Dynamic Compression and Relaxation in Microfluidics

Fluidity and elasticity form a concise set of viscoelastic biomarkers for breast cancer diagnosis based on Kelvin–Voigt fractional derivative modeling

Correlating the viscoelasticity of breast cancer cells with their malignancy

Relationship Between Parameters from Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification (VTQ) Imaging with Clinicopathologic Prognostic Factors in Women with Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer.

Linking metastatic potential and viscoelastic properties of breast cancer spheroids via dynamics compression and relaxation in microfluidics

Atomic force microscopy indentation and inverse analysis for non-linear viscoelastic identification of breast cancer cells

Strain Elastography Features In Invasive Breast Cancer: Relationship Between Stiffness And Pathological Factors

Viscoelasticity Measurements Reveal Rheological Differences Between Stem-like and Non-stem-like Breast Cancer Cells

Viscoelastic parameters as discriminators of breast masses: Initial human study results

Quantitative Parameters of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma: the Correlation with Pathological Prognostic Factors.

Invasive Breast Cancer: Relationship between Shear-wave Elastographic Findings and Histologic Prognostic Factors

Geometric characteristics of stromal collagen fibres in breast cancer using differential interference contrast microscopy

Ultrasonic measurements of breast viscoelasticity

Viscoelastic Properties of Rodent Mammary Tumors Using Ultrasonic Shear-Wave Imaging

Nanoindentation Study of the Viscoelastic Properties of Human Triple Negative Breast Cancer Tissues: Implications for Mechanical Biomarkers

Complex cystic and solid breast lesions: diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasound, strain imaging and point shear wave speed measurement.

Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging and Quantification: Value in Malignancy Prediction for Complex Cystic and Solid Breast Lesions