'Outcomes of genetic testing in the London MND Center: the importance of achieving timely results and correlations to family history'

Dean Spencer James Polke Joanna Campbell Henry Houlden Aleksandar Radunovic 1 Department of Neurology,Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust,London,UK and2 Neurogenetics Laboratory,National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery and North Thames Genomics Laboratory Hub,London,UK
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2024.2370808
2024-06-27
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration
Abstract:Background : Despite recognition of the importance of genetic factors in the pathogenesis of MND and the increasing availability of genetic testing, testing practice remains highly variable. With the arrival of gene-targeted therapies there is a growing need to promptly identify actionable genetic results and patient death before receipt of results raises ethical dilemmas and limits access to novel therapies. Objective : To identify pathogenic mutations within a London tertiary MND center and their correlation with family history. To record waiting times for genetic results and deaths prior to receipt of results. Methods : In this series of 100 cases, genetic testing was offered to all patients with an MND diagnosis from the tertiary clinic. Data on demographics, disease progression and a detailed family history were taken. Time to receipt of genetic results and patient deaths prior to this were recorded. Results : Of the 97 patients who accepted testing a genetic cause was identified in 10%, including seven C9orf72 and two positive SOD1 cases. Only three patients with positive genetic findings had a family history of MND, although alternative neurological diagnoses and symptoms in the family were frequently reported. 14% of patients who underwent testing were deceased by the time results were received, including one actionable SOD1 case. Conclusions : Genetic testing should be made available to all patients who receive an MND diagnosis as family history alone is inadequate to identify potential familial cases. Time to receipt of results remains a significant issue due to the limited life expectancy following diagnosis.
clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?