Abstract:Solar radiation modification has been suggested as a backup option to reduce anthropogenic warming. Marine cloud brightening (MCB) and ocean albedo modification (OAM) are two proposed approaches to intentionally reflect sunlight back to space over oceanic regions. Using the NCAR Community Earth System Model, we compare climate response to MCB and OAM under the framework of fast adjustment and slow feedback. We implement MCB and OAM uniformly over the global ocean to offset CO2-induced warming. We find that to offset 3.3 K global mean warming from a doubling of CO2, diagnosed effective radiative forcing is -4.8 and -3.6 W m(-2) for OAM and MCB, respectively. Correspondingly, radiative forcing efficacy of OAM is about 70% of MCB. Fast climate adjustment differs in response to MCB and OAM forcing. MCB cools the lower atmosphere by reflecting sunlight from cloud, causing a reduction in sunlight absorption in the atmosphere. In contrast, OAM, by reflecting more sunlight from surface, increases shortwave heating of the lower atmosphere, leading to a decrease in low marine clouds and hence a positive cloudy-sky shortwave forcing that partly compensates the negative clear-sky shortwave forcing. The slow climate response and pattern of equilibrium climate change are similar between MCB and OAM. As for hydrological cycle, relative to the climate under a doubling of CO2, both MCB and OAM produce an increase in precipitation and runoff over tropical land. Plain Language Summary To counteract anthropogenic CO2-induced global warming, various climate intervention approaches have been proposed. Among them, two approaches intend to reflect more sunlight back to space over ocean. One is marine cloud brightening that involves enhancement of marine cloud albedo. The other is ocean albedo modification that involves enhancement of ocean surface albedo. This study uses an Earth system model to compare climate response to these two climate intervention approaches. In our simulations, both approaches are designed to offset global mean surface warming caused by a doubling of atmospheric CO2. For the same amount of global cooling, ocean albedo modification produces a much stronger negative radiative forcing, implying that the forcing efficacy is smaller than that of marine cloud brightening. Under fixed sea surface temperature, fast climate adjustments, including changes in cloud and precipitation, differ substantially between these two approaches. This is mainly because ocean albedo modification reflects more sunlight from ocean surface, heating the lower atmosphere, but marine cloud brightening reflects more sunlight from cloud, cooling the lower atmosphere. When the climate system reaches a new equilibrium state after the adjustment of the atmosphere and upper ocean, these two approaches produce similar pattern of climate change.

Chemistry-albedo feedbacks offset up to a third of forestation's CO 2 removal benefits

Land-atmosphere feedbacks reduce positive albedo forcing of afforestation

Simulated Carbon Cycle and Earth System Response to Atmospheric CO2 Removal

Global and regional hydrological impacts of global forest expansion

Biophysical considerations in forestry for climate protection

Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Removal: Long-Term Consequences and Commitment

Trade-offs in using European forests to meet climate objectives

Impact on Short-Lived Climate Forcers Increases Projected Warming Due to Deforestation

Climate More Responsive to Marine Cloud Brightening Than Ocean Albedo Modification: A Model Study

Limited climate change mitigation potential through forestation of the vast dryland regions

CO2 and albedo climate impacts of extratropical carbon and biomass plantations

Global forestation and deforestation affect remote climate via adjusted atmosphere and ocean circulation

Albedo-dominated biogeophysical warming effects induced by vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau, China

CarbonSink Plus - Accounting for Multiple Climate Feedbacks from Forests

Mitigation Impact of Different Harvest Scenarios of Finnish Forests That Account for Albedo, Aerosols, and Trade-Offs of Carbon Sequestration and Avoided Emissions

Rising atmospheric CO2 reduces sequestration of root-derived soil carbon

A Bioenergy-Focused Versus a Reforestation-Focused Mitigation Pathway Yields Disparate Carbon Storage and Climate Responses.

Amplifying Effects of Land‐use Change on Future Atmospheric CO2 Levels

Joint Optimization of Land Carbon Uptake and Albedo Can Help Achieve Moderate Instantaneous and Long-Term Cooling Effects

Local Surface Cooling from Afforestation Amplified by Lower Aerosol Pollution

Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade‐offs