Abstract:Objective: Endovascular techniques in trauma surgery are becoming increasingly important in patient management, with procedures such as pelvic and splenic angioembolization becoming the standard of care for certain injuries. Traditionally, such interventions are performed via femoral access, although the morbidity of this approach is not insignificant (3%-10%). Transradial access (TRA) is an attractive alternative, pioneered by cardiologists, with low rates of access site complications in patients undergoing coronary intervention. Recently, this technology has extended to other interventions. The aim of this study was to present the initial experience of a radial program in a busy trauma center, with specific regard to safety and complications. Methods: The medical records of trauma patients undergoing endovascular procedures via TRA between March 2018 and December 2018 were queried for procedural and postoperative data. Demography and injury characteristics were presented for the overall cohort, followed by a comparison of procedural data and complications between laterality. Continuous variables were compared using a two-tailed t-test and categorical variables were compared using a χ2 test. Results: Over a 9-month period, 65 patients underwent 81 interventions via TRA, most commonly solid organ or pelvic angiography/embolization. Radial artery access was achieved in all patients, with procedural success achieved in all but two patients (n = 63 [96.9%]) who had hypoplastic radial artery anatomy, who underwent ulnar access. The overall technique-related complication rate was 1.5% with no difference observed between laterality (n = 1; P = .523). One patient with an admission Glasgow Coma Score of 3 and coagulopathy developed radial artery thrombosis after pelvic angiography via right TRA. Mortality was seen in seven patients (10.8%) owing to hemorrhagic shock (n = 3 [42.8%]) or multiorgan failure (n = 4 [57.1%]). There were no cases of postprocedural access site bleeding, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, vascular injury, intraoperative arrhythmia or cerebrovascular accident, arteriovenous fistula formation, or infection. Conclusions: TRA is a feasible and low-risk alternative for endovascular intervention in the trauma patient. It yields good technical success with low morbidity. Although larger studies are needed to establish the full efficacy of TRA at the multi-institutional level, this single-institution study demonstrates the legitimacy of an alternative means for endovascular intervention in the trauma patient.

Practical uses of the BENCHMARKTM BMX®81 in the road less travelled: Guide catheter comparison for radial access in neurovascular intervention

First multicenter study evaluating the utility of the BENCHMARKTM BMXTM 81 large-bore access catheter in neurovascular interventions

Distal Radial Artery Access is a Safe and Feasible Technique in the Anatomical Snuffbox for Visceral Intervention

Radial access for cerebrovascular procedures: Case report and technical note

An improved technique for gaining radial artery access in endovascular interventions.

Radial artery access with a sheathless 0.087" inner diameter balloon guide catheter (Walrus) for neurointerventional procedures: Technique and clinical outcomes

Transradial interventions in contemporary vascular surgery practice

The Era of Radial-Specific Catheters: A Multicenter Comparison of the Armadillo and RIST Catheters in Transradial Procedures

Rist Guide Catheter for Endovascular Procedures: Initial Case Series from a Single Center

Distal radial access in the anatomical snuffbox for neurointerventions: a feasibility, safety, and proof-of-concept study

706 Radial Versus Femoral Access for Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

Complications of Radial vs Femoral Access For Coronary Angiography and Intervention: What Do The Data Tell Us?

Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Catheter for Transradial Cerebral Angiography

Radial Access Approach to Peripheral Vascular Interventions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Transradial Approach for Coronary Intervention in 92 Cases

Comparison Between Distal Trans-radial Access and Conventional Trans-radial Access for Coronary Angiography

Procedural Outcomes With Femoral, Radial, Distal Radial, and Ulnar Access for Coronary Angiography: A Network Meta-Analysis

Safety and efficacy of radial access in trauma in 65 trauma endovascular cases

Radial access for peripheral vascular intervention: the S.M.A.R.T. RADIANZ Vascular Stent System

Feasibility and radial artery occlusion rate of sheathless distal transradial access using balloon guide catheters

Transradial cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention: a review