Breast milk feeding in premature infants with persistent ductus arteriosus

Alexandre Lapillonne,Chiara Lembo,Silvia Iacobelli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03048-z
IF: 3.953
2024-01-27
Pediatric Research
Abstract:We read with interest the comments by Porta et al. 1 on our recently published manuscript in Pediatric Research . 2 The aim of our manuscript was to review the current state of knowledge on nutritional issues related to patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants. Our review highlighted three key points that are difficult to dispute: (1) Preterm infants with PDA are particularly prone to suboptimal feeding, poor postnatal growth and gastrointestinal complications. (2) In PDA infants, fluid restriction can lead to inadequate nutrient intake, which can have a negative impact on postnatal growth and long-term health. (3) The consequences of PDA on mesenteric blood flow and splanchnic oxygenation, as well as the side effects of drugs used to treat PDA, are likely the main reasons for increased intestinal morbidities. Our review also highlighted the wide heterogeneity in neonatologists' practice in feeding preterm infants with PDA, probably due to the lack of solid data on the safety or harm of enteral feeding in these infants. We also emphasized that the amount of enteral feeding during PDA treatment varies by a factor of ~10 in different neonatal units. Porta et al. 1 claim that we limited ourselves to "concluding that initiation or maintenance of enteral nutrition can be recommended in infants with PDA." The question of whether enteral feeding should be withheld or continued during treatment of hemodynamically significant PDA is still debated, as both strategies can potentially lead to unfavorable outcomes. 3 In the absence of well-designed studies to assess the safety of maintaining enteral feeding, but given the data showing that mesenteric blood flow or splanchnic oxygenation is maintained in response to enteral feeding, and that the most common practice today is to maintain enteral feeding unchanged during treatment (rather than reducing enteral feeding, as has been the practice for decades), we clearly endorse the position of maintaining enteral feeding and indeed stated in the conclusions that "initiation or maintenance of enteral nutrition can be recommended." We reiterate here that basic research and sufficiently conclusive studies are urgently needed to clarify this question.
pediatrics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?