Changes in survival in people with IPF in England 2010-2020

Morgan,A.,Shah Gupta,R.,George,P.,Quint,J.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa5146
IF: 24.3
2024-11-01
European Respiratory Journal
Abstract:Background: Despite trial evidence of benefit, it is unknown whether survival has improved in the UK IPF population since the introduction of antifibrotics in the mid-2010s. Methods: Using linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum & Hospital Episode Statistics data, we calculated median survival times for patients diagnosed with IPF in 2010 and each year thereafter until 2018. For 2010–2020, we estimated age-and sex-adjusted hazard ratios for death (relative to 2010) and age-and sex-standardized all-cause mortality rates. We repeated our analyses using four differently-defined cohorts to explore whether survival and mortality trends were sensitive to coding choices for IPF case finding. 1 Results: In our study population (n=46,527) there was no significant difference in median survival (years) between those newly-diagnosed in 2010 and 2018 [Aurum narrow cohort=4.6 (95%CI,3.7–5.4) vs 3.7(3.4–4.3); Aurum broad cohort=3.7(3.4–4.0) vs 4.2(3.8–4.4)]. Age-and sex-adjusted Cox models with all-cause mortality as the outcome also provided no evidence of improved survival but age-and sex-standardized mortality rates increased over the study period (Fig.) These trends were independent of IPF case definitions. Conclusion: Between 2010 and 2020, survival time among IPF patients remained unchanged while the mortality rate increased. Longer follow-up time is needed to fully assess the impact of antifibrotics in this population. 1 Morgan et al. BMC Pulm Med. 2023;23:256.
respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?