A systematic review and meta-analysis of how social memory is studied

Meghan Cum,Jocelyn A. Santiago Pérez,Erika Wangia,Naeliz Lopez,Elizabeth S. Wright,Ryo L. Iwata,Albert Li,Amelia R. Chambers,Nancy Padilla-Coreano
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52277-z
IF: 4.6
2024-01-27
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Social recognition is crucial for survival in social species, and necessary for group living, selective reproduction, pair bonding, and dominance hierarchies. Mice and rats are the most commonly used animal models in social memory research, however current paradigms do not account for the complex social dynamics they exhibit in the wild. To assess the range of social memories being studied, we conducted a systematic analysis of neuroscience articles testing the social memory of mice and rats published within the past two decades and analyzed their methods. Our results show that despite these rodent's rich social memory capabilities, the majority of social recognition papers explore short-term memories and short-term familiarity levels with minimal exposure between subject and familiar stimuli—a narrow type of social memory. We have identified several key areas currently understudied or underrepresented: kin relationships, mates, social ranks, sex variabilities, and the effects of aging. Additionally, reporting on social stimulus variables such as housing history, strain, and age, is limited, which may impede reproducibility. Overall, our data highlight large gaps in the diversity of social memories studied and the effects social variables have on social memory mechanisms.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?