Abstract:Background/Aim: Azoospermia is defined as the absence of sperm in semen and is one of the most common causes of male infertility, with a prevalence of 10-15% in infertile men. Conventional methods for semen analysis do not provide a clear understanding of the etiology of azoospermia. Although testicular biopsy may exclude obstructive cases, non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) treatment is limited due to a limited understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms. Analysis of genetic alterations in azoospermia patients compared to the fertile population may be a valuable tool for determining diagnostic biomarkers for male infertility. This study aims to use bioinformatic tools to determine the top candidates in certain pathways altered in azoospermia. Methods: Expression data (GSE108886) of the differential testicular transcriptome in patients with NOA was selected from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Testicular RNA was harvested from azoospermia patients (n=11) and healthy controls (n=1, pooled sample). The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were examined using GEO2R software. Biological pathways were identified through the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). Construction of the protein network and detection of hub genes were conducted in the STRING database. Data validation was performed via ELISA assay for the FOXO3 gene in obstructive and NOA patients. Significance was set at P-value <0.05. Results: In NOA patients, 2115 genes were upregulated, and 1753 genes were downregulated compared to the control group. Ninety-one genes involved in spermatogenesis were downregulated. KEGG analysis revealed that the glucagon signaling, AMPK signaling, insulin and estrogen signaling, and oocyte meiosis pathways were upregulated, while the regulation of actin cytoskeleton, MAPK signaling pathway, focal adhesion, and chemical carcinogenesis – reactive oxygen species pathways were downregulated. Downstream genes with the highest score were PSMA4, PSMA6, PSMC1, PSME4, and UBA52, which are responsible for the ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation. The top hub genes with increasing expression were RPS18, RPS2, and RPS4X Conclusion: Although hub genes selected within the altering pathways may serve as a diagnostic tool for NOA, further validation of the presented data is necessary, as protein-protein interactions may not reflect alterations in gene expression in vivo.

Exploring the interaction between immune cells in the testicular microenvironment of azoospermia combining RNA-seq and scRNA-seq

Human obstructive (postvasectomy) and nonobstructive azoospermia – Insights from scRNA-Seq and transcriptome analysis

Macrophage-Related Testicular Inflammation in Individuals with Idiopathic Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: A Single-Cell Analysis.

Identification of seven genes essential for male fertility through a genome-wide association study of non-obstructive azoospermia and RNA interference-mediated large-scale functional screening in Drosophila.

Single-Cell Transcriptomics-Based Study of Transcriptional Regulatory Features in the Non-Obstructive Azoospermia Testis

Construction and external validation of a 5-gene random forest model to diagnose non-obstructive azoospermia based on the single-cell RNA sequencing of testicular tissue

Single-cell analysis of developing and azoospermia human testicles reveals central role of Sertoli cells

Whole transcriptome analysis to identify non-coding RNA regulators and hub genes in sperm of non-obstructive azoospermia by microarray, single-cell RNA sequencing, weighted gene co-expression network analysis, and mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA interaction analysis

Machine learning and integrative analysis identify the common pathogenesis of azoospermia complicated with COVID-19

Altered Microrna Profiles of Testicular Biopsies from Patients with Nonobstructive Azoospermia

In silico analysis of microRNA genes in azoospermia factor Y-chromosome microdeletions

The enigmatic interplay of immune cells and abnormal spermatozoa through Mendelian randomization

Identification and validation of SHC1 and FGFR1 as novel immune-related oxidative stress biomarkers of non-obstructive azoospermia

ScRNA-seq and scATAC-seq reveal that sertoli cell mediate spermatogenesis disorders through stage-specific communications in non-obstructive azoospermia

Genetic alterations in azoospermia patients may reveal potential biomarkers for male infertility: A bioinformatic study

Single-cell atlas of human developing and azoospermia patients’ testicles reveals the roadmap and defects in somatic microenvironment

Single-cell multi-omics analysis reveals dysfunctional Wnt signaling of spermatogonia in non-obstructive azoospermia

AZF gene expression analysis in peripheral leukocytes and testicular cells from idiopathic infertility

MicroRNA Profile Comparison of Testicular Tissues Derived from Successful and Unsuccessful Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction Retrieval in Non-Obstructive Azoospermia Patients.

CircRNA expression profile and functional analysis in testicular tissue of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia

Integrative Bioinformatics Approaches for Identifying Potential Biomarkers and Pathways Involved in Non-Obstructive Azoospermia