Abstract:This study aims to describe equity trend between women and men in wildlife‐related publishing in recent decades. We reviewed all research articles published in The Journal of Wildlife Management (JWM) from 1999 through 2020 and classified the gender of each author using the online tool Genderize.io. The percentage of authors identified by the tool as women increased during the study, but the percentage of women remained lower than that of men in 2020. An inequity persists between women and men in nearly all scientific fields. A clear indicator of this bias is the disparity between women and men in authorship of scientific papers, as publications are a critical part of a researcher's career. Our objective was to describe gender equity (sensu women, men) in wildlife‐related publishing in recent decades. We reviewed all research articles published in The Journal of Wildlife Management (JWM) from 1999 through 2020 and collected author names, affiliated institutions, and study species taxa from each paper. To help understand representation by gender in publishing, we classified the gender of each author using the online tool Genderize.io. We then calculated the women‐to‐men ratio in publishing as first‐ and co‐authors across time. We further investigated whether there were biases by country, institution, and taxon of study species. Our results revealed that authorships were dominated by men 22 years ago, with 14 and 12 women/100 men for first‐ and co‐authorships, respectively, in 1999. Since then, apart from year‐to‐year fluctuations, the overall gap between women and men gradually narrowed until the mid‐2010s, reaching approximately 60 and 30 women/100 men for first‐ and co‐authorship, respectively. The percentage of women increased across institutions, taxa, and countries during the study; however, the percentages of women associated with each institution type and most wildlife taxa were lower than the percentages of men. Although it is encouraging to see the improvement in equity in publishing since 1999, there are still substantially more men publishing than women, which indicates there is still a need to remedy known barriers and identify additional barriers that contribute to publication inequity.

Gender equity: toward redefining values

The multicontext path to redefining how we access and think about diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM

Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM

Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions

Achieving Gender and Social Equality: More Than Gender Parity Is Needed

Fixing the leaky pipeline: Tips to promote gender equity in Academic Medicine

Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions

Gender Issues in Computer Science: Lessons Learnt and Reflections for the Future

Eliminating Gender-Based Bias in Academic Medicine: More Than Naming the "Elephant in the Room"

GENDER EQUITY IN EDUCATION: ADDRESSING CHALLENGES AND PROMOTING OPPORTUNITIES FOR SOCIAL EMPOWERMENT

Commitment to inclusion: The importance of collaboration in gender equity work

A celebration and reflection on the equity trend between women and men in wildlife publishing

Gender Equity in Medicine and Dermatology in the United States: The Long Road Traveled and the Journey ahead

Women in physics in the United States: Reaching toward equity and inclusion

Empowering educators: the key to achieving gender parity in STEM fields

Redefining academic trajectories: A comprehensive analysis of the factors and impacts of the gender gap in STEM higher education

Promoting gender diversity in STEM faculty through leadership development

The gender equity gap: A multistudy investigation of within-job inequality in equity-based awards.

Is Gender Equity Possible in Academic Medicine or Are There More Useful Goals on Which to Focus?

Gender representation and academic achievement among STEM‐interested students in college STEM courses

‘I was completely oblivious to gender’: an exploration of how women in STEMM navigate leadership in a neoliberal, post-feminist context