Poster presentationsBT15 Ethical implications of artificial intelligence in dermatology: use-case analysis of skin cancer diagnostic smartphone apps

Fazal Shah,Daniel Arecco,Heather Draper,Rubeta Matin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae090.413
IF: 11.113
2024-06-28
British Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:Abstract Skin cancer is the most common cancer worldwide. Early diagnosis is crucial for improving patient survival and morbidity. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted smartphone applications (apps) for skin cancer potentially offer accessible, early risk assessment of suspicious skin lesions. If harnessed to effective and responsive dermatology services, they may improve patient outcomes. The integration of novel technologies into dermatology raises ethical concerns. Ethical principles for acceptable AI governance are well known. Less well elucidated are how these should be applied to actual AI apps. Ethical use-case analysis can improve this understanding. Accordingly, we undertook an ethical use-case analysis of commercially available skin cancer apps. We applied previously described methods for ethical analysis of clinical AI applications to two popular skin cancer apps: SkinVision and Scanoma (Rogers WA, Draper H, Carter SM. Evaluation of artificial intelligence clinical applications: detailed case analyses show value of healthcare ethics approach in identifying patient care issues. Bioethics 2021; 35: 623–33). Systematic searches incorporating published literature, regulatory documents, and websites were undertaken to provide a detailed description of each app, and review the available evidence about their development, effectiveness and use. Screening for inclusion was undertaken by two researchers independently. Ethical concerns were identified with reference to previously described ethical concerns and principles for AI-assisted healthcare. These data were also independently checked and agreed on. By conceptualizing ethical principles within the use context of skin cancer apps, we identified specific ethical issues arising throughout the AI lifecycle of both apps. One company provided extensive detail regarding algorithm development and decision making; this information was insufficiently reported for the other app. Other concerns identified related to the number, quality, consistency and independence of studies assessing algorithm efficacy. Limited efforts to address potential skin tone biases and exclusion of patients with darker skin as target users by one app risk perpetuating existing inequalities. Inadequate regulatory requirements were highlighted. To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first ethical use-case analysis of patient-facing AI-assisted skin cancer apps. Our findings suggest inadequate incorporation of bioethical norms such as justice, responsibility and transparency into the development and deployment of both apps. Improved regulation will increase accountability. Ensuring ethics by design through integration between technology developers, dermatologists, ethicists and patients is urgently needed to prevent the potential benefits of AI-assisted skin cancer apps being overshadowed by potential ethical harms.
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?