Proof-of-concept study exploring the effect of spesolimab in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Afsaneh Alavi,Errol Prens,Alexa B Kimball,John W Frew,James G Krueger,Sutirtha Mukhopadhyay,Heli Gao,Usha Ranganathan,Nathalie B Ivanoff,Ana C Hernandez Daly,Christos C Zouboulis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae144
IF: 11.113
2024-04-05
British Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:Abstract Background Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a considerable disease burden. Existing treatment options are limited and often suboptimal; a high unmet need exists for effective targeted therapies. Objective To explore the effects of spesolimab treatment in patients with HS. Methods This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-clinical-concept study was conducted at 25 centers across 12 countries from May 3, 2021, to April 21, 2022. Patients had moderate-to-severe HS for ≥1 year before enrollment. Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive a loading dose of 3600 mg intravenous spesolimab (1200 mg at Weeks 0, 1, and 2) or matching placebo, followed by maintenance with either 1200 mg subcutaneous spesolimab every 2 weeks from Week 4–10 or matching placebo. The primary endpoint was the percentage change from baseline in total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count at Week 12. Secondary endpoints were the absolute change from baseline in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), percentage change from baseline in draining tunnel (dT) count, the proportion of patients achieving a dT count of zero, absolute change from baseline in revised Hidradenitis Suppurativa Area and Severity Index (HASI-R), the proportion of patients achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR50), the proportion of patients with ≥1 flare (all at Week 12), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Results In this completed trial, randomized patients (N=52) received spesolimab (n=35) or placebo (n=17). The difference (95% confidence interval) versus placebo in least squares mean are reported. At Week 12, the percentage change in total AN count was similar between treatment arms: −4.1% (−31.7, 23.4). There was greater numerical improvement in the spesolimab arm, as measured by IHS4: −13.9 (−25.6, −2.3); percentage change from baseline in dT count: −96.6% (−154.5, −38.8); and the proportion of patients achieving a dT count of zero: 18.3% (−7.9, 37.5). Spesolimab treatment also improved HASI-R and HiSCR50 versus placebo. Spesolimab demonstrated a favorable safety profile, similar to that observed in trials in other diseases. Conclusions This exploratory proof-of-clinical-concept study supports the development of spesolimab as a new therapeutic option in HS. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04762277.
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to explore the impact of the drug spesolimab on patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Specifically, the study evaluates the efficacy and safety of spesolimab in treating patients with moderate to severe HS through a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept trial. The primary endpoint of the study is the percentage change from baseline in the total number of abscesses and inflammatory nodules at week 12. Additionally, the study examines other secondary endpoints, including the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), changes in the number of draining tunnels, the revised Hidradenitis Suppurativa Area and Severity Index (HASI-R), and patient-reported outcomes. The results of the study indicate that, although there was no significant difference between the spesolimab group and the placebo group in the primary endpoint, spesolimab showed certain advantages in terms of overall disease severity, reduction in the number of draining tunnels, and had good safety. These findings support further development of spesolimab as a new therapy for treating HS.