Abstract:Background The theoretical basis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is statistical inference of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between any polymorphic marker and a putative disease locus. Most methods widely implemented for such analyses are vulnerable to several key demographic factors and deliver a poor statistical power for detecting genuine associations and also a high false positive rate. Here, we present a likelihood-based statistical approach that accounts properly for non-random nature of case–control samples in regard of genotypic distribution at the loci in populations under study and confers flexibility to test for genetic association in presence of different confounding factors such as population structure, non-randomness of samples etc. Results We implemented this novel method together with several popular methods in the literature of GWAS, to re-analyze recently published Parkinson’s disease (PD) case–control samples. The real data analysis and computer simulation show that the new method confers not only significantly improved statistical power for detecting the associations but also robustness to the difficulties stemmed from non-randomly sampling and genetic structures when compared to its rivals. In particular, the new method detected 44 significant SNPs within 25 chromosomal regions of size < 1 Mb but only 6 SNPs in two of these regions were previously detected by the trend test based methods. It discovered two SNPs located 1.18 Mb and 0.18 Mb from the PD candidates, FGF20 and PARK8 , without invoking false positive risk. Conclusions We developed a novel likelihood-based method which provides adequate estimation of LD and other population model parameters by using case and control samples, the ease in integration of these samples from multiple genetically divergent populations and thus confers statistically robust and powerful analyses of GWAS. On basis of simulation studies and analysis of real datasets, we demonstrated significant improvement of the new method over the non-parametric trend test, which is the most popularly implemented in the literature of GWAS.

Using Alternative Definitions of Controls to Increase Statistical Power in GWAS

Alternative Methods for H1 Simulations in Genome Wide Association Studies

Accounting for multiple comparisons in a genome-wide association study (GWAS)

Principles for the Post-Gwas Functional Characterisation of Risk Loci

Efficiently controlling for case-control imbalance and sample relatedness in large-scale genetic association studies

A Robust and Efficient Statistical Method for Genetic Association Studies Using Case and Control Samples from Multiple Cohorts

Integrating External Controls by Regression Calibration for Genome-Wide Association Study

Controlling the Rate of GWAS False Discoveries

A Knowledge-Based Weighting Framework to Boost the Power of Genome-Wide Association Studies

CCAFE: Estimating Case and Control Allele Frequencies from GWAS Summary Statistics

Accurate cross-platform GWAS analysis via two-stage imputation

Underestimated Effect Sizes in GWAS: Fundamental Limitations of Single SNP Analysis for Dichotomous Phenotypes

Consequence of adjustments for demographic or clinical covariates and a recommended solution in genome-wide association studies

On Combining Data From Genome-Wide Association Studies to Discover Disease-Associated SNPs

Power Estimation Of Multiple Snp Association Test Of Case-Control Study And Application

Impact of genotyping errors on statistical power of association tests in genomic analyses: A case study.

Revisiting the genome-wide significance threshold for common variant GWAS

Univariate/Multivariate Genome-Wide Association Scans Using Data from Families and Unrelated Samples

Optimized phenotype definitions boost GWAS power

A dynamic model for genome-wide association studies

In search of causal variants: refining disease association signals using cross-population contrasts