Abstract:Background: Romosozumab is a novel monoclonal antibody that binds to sclerostin, and has dual effects of increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption, giving it a unique mechanism of action. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis based on existing worldwide data on treatment effects and safety of romosozumab in randomized controlled trials. Methods: A systematic search was carried out on four databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The keywords used for search was "(romosozumab) AND (osteoporosis OR safety)". Randomized controlled trial or post-hoc studies of the included randomized controlled trial which studied the effects and safety of romosozumab were included. The quality of selected studies was assessed with the Cochrane collaboration tool and the PEDro scale. Results: 20 studies were included for qualitative analysis. 14 studies were included for meta-analysis. In total, there were 13,507 (n = 13,507) participants with 637 men and 12,870 women from original cohorts. The overall mean difference was in favor of romosozumab treatment for lumbar spine (10.04 (95 % confidence interval (CI) = 7.51-12.57; p < 0.00001)), total hip (4.04 (95 % CI = 3.10-4.99; p < 0.00001)) and femoral neck bone mineral density (3.77 (95 % CI = 2.90-4.64; p < 0.00001)) at 12 months. There was significantly less likelihood of new vertebral fractures with romosozumab compared to control (odds ratio (OR) 0.42 (95 % CI = 0.20-0.89); p = 0.02) at 12 months of treatment. There was significantly less likelihood of new vertebral fracture at 24 months with 12 months of romosozumab followed by sequential treatment with anti-resorptive compared to control with only anti-resorptive agent use (OR 0.36 (95 % CI = 0.18-0.71); p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in serious adverse events and fatal adverse events with use of romosozumab compared with control in our meta-analyses. There were no significant differences in serious cardiovascular events in Asian population of romosozumab with control group with 12 months of romosozumab treatment followed by 24 months of anti-resorptive agent with OR 1.09 (95 % CI = 0.40-2.96; P = 0.86). There was no significant difference between romosozumab group and control group for the median time to radiographic healing. Our qualitative analysis on Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT), Finite element analysis (FEA) and bone biopsy analyses demonstrated that romosozumab improved parameters and measures in these domains as well. Conclusion: In conclusion, our study showed that romosozumab was an effective agent to treat osteoporosis with high quality evidence. There were no significant differences in the adverse events, serious adverse events, fatal adverse events identified. Further subgroup analysis of cardiovascular events and cardiovascular death in the total population showed no differences either. The translational potential of this article: Given the results, romosozumab is an effective agent to treat patients with very-high risk of osteoporotic fractures.

Meta-analysis of the effects of denosumab and romosozumab on bone mineral density and turnover markers in patients with osteoporosis

Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis

Effects of romosozumab combined with routine therapy on pain relief, disease progression and adverse reactions in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Treatment effects, adverse outcomes and cardiovascular safety of romosozumab - Existing worldwide data: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Real-world effects, safety, and predictors of the effectiveness of romosozumab in primary and secondary osteoporosis: An observational study

Comparison of Denosumab with Romosozumab in the treatment of male osteoporosis: a retrospective cohort study

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Safety Between Denosumab and Alendronate in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: a Meta-Analysis

Comparison of romosozumab versus denosumab treatment on bone mineral density after 1 year in rheumatoid arthritis patients with severe osteoporosis: A randomized clinical pilot study

Romosozumab for the treatment of osteoporosis - a systematic review

A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of Romosozumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis

Romosozumab versus Teriparatide for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis through a Grade Analysis of Evidence

Effect of the duration of previous osteoporosis treatment on the effect of romosozumab treatment

Comparison of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and Trabecular Bone Score (TBS)

The Effectiveness and Safety of Romosozumab and Teriparatide in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

3D-modeling from hip DXA shows improved bone structure with romosozumab followed by denosumab or alendronate

Romosozumab: A Review in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Extending the Therapeutic Potential: Romosozumab in Osteoporosis Management

Romosozumab followed by denosumab versus denosumab only: a post hoc analysis of FRAME and FRAME extension

Romosozumab in Postmenopausal Korean Women with Osteoporosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of romosozumab (evenity) for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in postmenopausal women: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (CDM-J)

A novel sequential treatment approach between denosumab and romosozumab in patients with severe osteoporosis