Abstract:The concept of co-benefit, a negotiation topic in CO2 mitigation attracts worldwide attention including China in coping with climate change. Energy saving technologies as common measures for CO2 abatement, generally lead to co-benefits of local air pollution (LAP) because most LAP emissions are generated from combustion of carbonic fuels along with CO2. However, in the technological dimension, there are technologies that induce opposite effects on the co-benefit of CO2 and LAP in specific industry sectors. Precalcinating line and shaft kiln, two types of technologies adopted in clinker calcinating procedure in cement industry are examples: the former consume less energy but emit more dust and NOx than the later. As a result, the overall co-benefits of LAP reductions for cement industry are uncertain. This study consequently aims at assessing the overall co-benefit (although it may be a negative co-benefit) of CO2 mitigation policy on dust, NOx, SO2 emissions in China's cement industry aggregately by establishing bottom-up optimization model on the basis of all types of technologies which are called technology system in cement production. CO2 mitigation goal, as represented by reduction rate is regarded as constraint input into the model. In order to investigate the evolution of co-benefits and technology paths with the change of CO2 mitigation goal, hundreds of reduction rates are selected randomly between the range 0.5-10.5%. The lower bound 0.5% reveals CO2 emission reduction that can be reached for cement industry under existing political constraints and without any extra CO2 mitigation goal. The upper bound 10.5% is the greatest reduction rate under which the model could derive feasible solution. According to changes of technology penetration rates as CO2 goal tightens, we could evaluate the more cost-effective technologies from the perspective of co-benefit. They are vertical milling, precalcinating line with the scale of 7000-10,000 ton/day, roll-squeezer belonging to Main Production Technology (MPT), utilization of cement grinding aids, multi-channel coal burner belonging to Affiliated Energy-saving technology (AES), combination of bag-filter and electrostatic precipitator and ultra-low NOx burning technology belonging to Pollution Control Technology (PCT). With respect to the evolution of co-benefits on air pollutions, when the CO2 reduction rate is below 2.3%, co-benefit of dust and SO2 reduction exist while that of NOx does not; and when the rate is above 2.3%, co-benefits of all the three pollutants exist. A practically referable goal of CO2 mitigation rate of short/mid-term is approximately 5.5% in view of the following three considerations: a) co-benefits augment as CO2 reduction rate increases; b) total cost increases as the CO2 abatement goal becomes stricter; and c) the majority of emerging technologies normally cannot penetrate to 100% in cement production within a relatively short time. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

A technology-driven pathway to net-zero carbon emissions for China's cement industry

Closing the Gap Between Carbon Neutrality Targets and Action: Technology Solutions for China’s Key Energy-Intensive Sectors

China's Green Deal: Can China's Cement Industry Achieve Carbon Neutral Emissions by 2060?

Low carbon technology roadmap of China cement industry

Historical trend and decarbonization pathway of China's cement industry: A literature review

Goal and Technology Path of CO2 Mitigation in China's Cement Industry: from the Perspective of Co-Benefit

China's cement demand and CO2 emissions toward 2030: from the perspective of socioeconomic, technology and population

Technological Solutions to China's Carbon Neutrality in the Steel and Cement Sectors

[Assessment of Emission Reduction Potential of CO2 Capture, Geological Utilization, and Storage in Cement Industry of China]

Capturing CO2 from Cement Plants: A Priority for Reducing CO2 Emissions in China

Greening Cement in China: A Cost-Effective Roadmap

Projecting future carbon emissions from cement production in developing countries

Negative emission technology is key to decarbonizing China's cement industry

Toward carbon neutrality in China: A national wide carbon flow tracing and the CO2 emission control strategies for CO2-intensive industries

The Potential and Cost Analysis of Emission Reduction in China’s Cement Sector

Evaluation of energy saving potential in China's cement industry using the Asian-Pacific Integrated Model and the technology promotion policy analysis

Quantifying the Impacts of Decarbonisation in China’s Cement Sector: A Perspective from an Integrated Assessment Approach

Plant-level Green Transformation Strategy in China’s Cement Industry: Considering Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction Co-Benefits

A Scenario Simulation of Material Substitution in the Cement Industry under the Carbon Neutral Strategy: A Case Study of Guangdong

Carbon uptake by cement in China: Estimation and contribution to carbon neutrality goals

Low-Carbon Transition in the Cement Industry