Impact of olfactory function on the trajectory of cognition, motor function, and quality of life in Parkinson's disease

Chia-Yen Lin,Yu-Shan Tsai,Ming-Hong Chang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2024.1329551
IF: 4.8
2024-03-05
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Abstract:Background: Olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with more severe phenotypes, but trajectories of cognitive function, disease severity, and subdomains of quality-of-life measurements in patients with distinct olfactory profiles remain underexplored. Objective: To analyze the influence of olfaction on trajectories of clinical parameters in patients with PD. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Subjects: From October 2016 to May 2021, the study tracked 58 participants over 3 years. Participants completed follow-up assessments using tools including the Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania's Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, and the Chinese translation of the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39). Methods: Participants were divided into anosmia (UPSIT < 19) and non-anosmia (UPSIT ≥ 19) groups based on initial scores. Generalized estimating equations and repeated measures correlations were used to examine longitudinal associations and correlations between olfaction and clinical parameters. Results: Divergent cognitive trajectories were observed between groups. The anosmia group exhibited a faster cognitive decline (adjusted B [beta coefficient] = −1.8, p = 0.012) according to the interaction effect of olfaction and time on the MoCA score. The anosmia group exhibited no longitudinal correlation between cognition and olfactory function but showed correlations with age ( r rm [coefficient of repeated measures correlation] = −0.464, p = 0.004) and disease duration ( r rm = −0.457, p = 0.005). The non-anosmia group's UPSIT scores decreased over time ( B = −2.3, p = 0.005) alongside a significant correlation with motor function ( r rm = −0.479, p = 0.006). Conclusion: The anosmia group's accelerated cognitive decline correlated with age and disease duration, but not olfactory function, suggesting a poor cognitive outcome in this population despite the lack of longitudinal correlation between cognition and olfaction. The non-anosmia group exhibited progressive olfactory degradation and notable correlations between motor function and UPSIT scores, implying pathological accumulation in the olfactory structure and basal ganglia.
neurosciences,geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?