Abstract:Deep convolutional neural networks often perform poorly when faced with datasets that suffer from quantity imbalances and classification difficulties. Despite advances in the field, existing two-stage approaches still exhibit dataset bias or domain shift. To counter this, a phased progressive learning schedule has been proposed that gradually shifts the emphasis from representation learning to training the upper classifier. This approach is particularly beneficial for datasets with larger imbalances or fewer samples. Another new method a coupling-regulation-imbalance loss function is proposed, which combines three parts: a correction term, focal loss, and LDAM loss. This loss is effective in addressing quantity imbalances and outliers, while regulating the focus of attention on samples with varying classification difficulties. These approaches have yielded satisfactory results on several benchmark datasets, including Imbalanced CIFAR10, Imbalanced CIFAR100, ImageNet-LT, and iNaturalist 2018, and can be easily generalized to other imbalanced classification models. Deep convolutional neural networks often perform poorly when faced with datasets that suffer from quantity imbalances and classification difficulties. Despite advances in the field, existing two-stage approaches still exhibit dataset bias or domain shift. To counter this, a phased progressive learning schedule has been proposed that gradually shifts the emphasis from representation learning to training the upper classifier. This approach is particularly beneficial for datasets with larger imbalances or fewer samples. Another new method a coupling-regulation-imbalance loss function is proposed, which combines three parts: a correction term, focal loss, and LDAM loss. This loss is effective in addressing quantity imbalances and outliers, while regulating the focus of attention on samples with varying classification difficulties. These approaches have yielded satisfactory results on several benchmark datasets, including Imbalanced CIFAR10, Imbalanced CIFAR100, ImageNet-LT, and iNaturalist 2018, and can be easily generalized to other imbalanced classification models.

An Adaptive Deep Metric Learning Loss Function for Class-Imbalance Learning via Intraclass Diversity and Interclass Distillation

Ranked List Loss for Deep Metric Learning

Threshold-Consistent Margin Loss for Open-World Deep Metric Learning

Dice Semimetric Losses: Optimizing the Dice Score with Soft Labels

Dynamically balancing class losses in imbalanced deep learning

Metric Learning with Adaptive Density Discrimination

Discriminative Additive Scale Loss for Deep Imbalanced Classification and Embedding

Adaptive Hierarchical Similarity Metric Learning with Noisy Labels

Deep Metric Learning With Density Adaptivity

Distance Metric Learning with Joint Representation Diversification

Handling Inter-class and Intra-class Imbalance in Class-imbalanced Learning

Borderline-margin loss based deep metric learning framework for imbalanced data

Is Fairness Only Metric Deep? Evaluating and Addressing Subgroup Gaps in Deep Metric Learning

Multiset Feature Learning for Highly Imbalanced Data Classification

Improving Deep Metric Learning Via Self-Distillation and Online Batch Diffusion Process

A Class Imbalance Loss for Imbalanced Object Recognition.

Phased progressive learning with coupling-regulation-imbalance loss for imbalanced data classification

Iterative Metric Learning for Imbalance Data Classification

Towards Inter-class and Intra-class Imbalance in Class-imbalanced Learning

Exponential Discriminative Metric Embedding in Deep Learning