P781 Mirikizumab administration experience from Ulcerative Colitis patients and healthcare providers: Survey data from the LUCENT clinical program

D Clemow,C Radawski,J Milata,K Alaka,T Hunter Gibble,A Schaum,O Ezennia,N Martinez,T Szaloki,Y Ito,D Rodriguez,K Kirk
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0911
2024-01-01
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Abstract:Abstract Background Mirikizumab (MIRI) is an anti-IL-p19 antibody approved for moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). The recommended dose regimen has 2 parts: MIRI administration begins with intravenous (IV) infusion every 4 weeks (Q4W; 3 total) followed by subcutaneous (SC) injections (2 injections per dose) Q4W (Figure 1). Self-injection of SC MIRI is allowed after patient training. This study explored differences between healthcare provider (HCP) perspectives of UC patients’ experiences and patients’ actual experiences regarding MIRI administration during the LUCENT program. It also assessed HCPs’ own experiences with MIRI administration. Methods The study involved two cross-sectional, 30-min, web-based surveys including one for patients and one for HCPs. Patients were eligible if they were enrolled in LUCENT-3 having entered from LUCENT-1 or -2 phase 3 studies or AMAC phase 2 study. HCPs from LUCENT-3 sites were eligible if they administered or oversaw MIRI IV infusions or SC injections during LUCENT-1, -2, -3, or AMAC. Survey questions had responses based on 5-point Likert scales. Outcomes included satisfaction with and acceptability of MIRI administration (Table 1). The survey was completed during LUCENT-3; MIRI SC injection experience at the time of survey varied from >2 to ≥3 yrs. Results The surveys were completed by 93 patients from 11 countries and 42 HCPs (gastroenterologist/physician 31.0%, nurse 40.5%, other [coordinator] 28.6%) from 9 countries. Most patients were satisfied or very satisfied with IV infusions (82.8%) and SC injections (91.4%), which was lower than HCPs’ perspectives of patients’ experiences (IV, 92.9%; SC, 100%), but generally similar to HCPs’ own experiences (IV, 81.0%; SC, 95.2%). Consistent with patients’ actual experiences (SC Q4W, 97.8%; two injections, 96.8%), most HCPs thought that patients felt that receiving SC injections Q4W (100%) and receiving 2 SC injections for each dose (92.9%) were somewhat or completely acceptable. Patients (97.8%) were satisfied or very satisfied with MIRI administration overall and 90.3% agreed or strongly agreed that treatment benefits outweighed any administration dissatisfaction. These patient perspectives were similar to both HCP perspectives of UC patients’ experiences (95.2%; 88.1%) and HCPs’ own experiences (97.6%; 95.2%). Conclusion Most patients and HCPs were satisfied or very satisfied and acceptable or completely acceptable of MIRI IV and SC administration. Patients’ experiences were similar to HCPs’ perspectives of patients’ experiences as well as HCPs’ own experiences, although there was a tendency for HCPs to perceive patients’ satisfaction to be very satisfied at a higher rate than patients’ actual responses.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?