Predictive utility of the P3 event‐related potential (ERP) response to alcohol cues for ecologically assessed alcohol craving and use

Casey B. Kohen,Roberto U. Cofresí,Thomas M. Piasecki,Bruce D. Bartholow
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.13368
2024-02-02
Addiction Biology
Abstract:This study provides the first evidence that the amplitude of the P3 event‐related potential elicited by alcohol cues (i.e., AlcP3) predicts rapid acceleration of estimated blood alcohol concentration (eBAC) during ecologically assessed drinking episodes in emerging adults. Individuals whose AlcP3 amplitudes were relatively large evinced significantly steeper increases in eBAC when drinking than did their peers whose AlcP3 amplitudes were smaller. These findings support a link between incentive salience attribution for alcohol cues and "front‐loading" drinking topographies in underage drinkers. Neural measures of alcohol cue incentive salience have been associated with retrospective reports of riskier alcohol use behaviour and subjective response profiles. This study tested whether the P3 event‐related potential (ERP) elicited by alcohol‐related cues (ACR‐P3) can forecast alcohol use and craving during real‐world drinking episodes. Participants (N = 262; Mage = 19.53; 56% female) completed a laboratory task in which they viewed images of everyday objects (Neutral), non‐alcohol drinks (NonAlc) and alcohol beverages (Alc) while EEG was recorded and then completed a 21‐day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) protocol in which they recorded alcohol craving and consumption. Anthropometrics were used to derive estimated blood alcohol concentration (eBAC) throughout drinking episodes. Multilevel modelling indicated positive associations between P3 amplitudes elicited by all stimuli and within‐episode alcohol use measures (e.g., eBAC, cumulative drinks). Focal follow‐up analyses indicated a positive association between AlcP3 amplitude and eBAC within episodes: Larger AlcP3 was associated with a steeper rise in eBAC. This association was robust to controlling for the association between NonAlcP3 and eBAC. AlcP3 also was positively associated with episode‐level measures (e.g., max drinks, max eBAC). There were no associations between any P3 variables and EMA‐based craving measures. Thus, individual differences in neural measures of alcohol cue incentive salience appear to predict the speed and intensity of alcohol consumption but not reports of craving during real‐world alcohol use episodes.
biochemistry & molecular biology,substance abuse
What problem does this paper attempt to address?