Joint Reflectivity and Structural Interval- Q Estimation by Using Nonstationary Sparse Inversion

Liang Cheng,Sanyi Yuan,Shangxu Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/lgrs.2020.2987395
IF: 5.343
2021-05-01
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
Abstract:Reliable estimate of the anelastic attenuation factor- $Q$ from seismic records is highly desirable for improving seismic resolution. However, the conventional equivalent- $Q$ or horizontal interval- $Q$ estimation ignores that $Q$ -distribution should hold the same ability for the subsurface structure characterization as seismic data. To pursue an accurate $Q$ -model, we propose a technique for joint reflectivity and structural interval- $Q$ estimation by using nonstationary sparse inversion. We designed a structural interval- $Q$ model by dividing the seismic data into several structural layers with the interpreted horizon(s). Attenuations in each layer are close to each other and can be described by an equivalent- $Q$ or gradient- $Q$ . Based on the attenuation theory, the nonstationary sparse inversion is solved iteratively, where, at each iteration, the equivalent- $Q$ of only one layer is optimized by searching for the corresponding optimum inverted reflectivity, leading to a structural interval- $Q$ model. The main advantages of our method are its objectivity and accuracy because of the integration of the prior structural information from interpreted horizons into joint reflectivity-estimation and $Q$ -estimation. The test of synthetic and field data clearly illustrates that the proposed method enables high-precision structural interval- $Q$ estimation and sufficiently compensates for $Q$ -related attenuation.
imaging science & photographic technology,remote sensing,engineering, electrical & electronic,geochemistry & geophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: how to accurately estimate the structural interval - Q value in heterogeneous media from seismic records and simultaneously estimate the reflectivity, so as to improve seismic resolution and compensate for Q - related attenuation. ### Problem Background In seismic data processing, seismic waves are absorbed and attenuated by strata when propagating underground, and this attenuation mechanism is quantified by the quality factor \(Q\). Traditional equivalent \(Q\) or horizontal interval \(Q\) estimation methods ignore that the \(Q\) distribution should have the same ability to describe underground structural features as seismic data. Therefore, these methods are not accurate enough in estimating the \(Q\) model, resulting in the inability to fully compensate for the attenuation effect in seismic data and affecting seismic resolution. ### Method Proposed in the Paper To solve the above problems, the paper proposes a joint reflectivity and structural interval \(Q\) estimation technique based on non - stationary sparse inversion. Specifically: 1. **Structural Interval \(Q\) Model**: - Divide the seismic data into multiple structural layers according to the interpreted formation interfaces. - The attenuation characteristics within each structural layer are similar and can be described by equivalent \(Q\) or gradient \(Q\). 2. **Non - stationary Sparse Inversion**: - Use the non - stationary sparse inversion method for iterative solution. In each iteration, optimize the equivalent \(Q\) of one structural layer, and finally construct the structural interval \(Q\) model by searching for the corresponding optimal reflectivity. - In each iteration, determine the optimal equivalent \(Q\) and the corresponding reflectivity by minimizing sparsity. 3. **Combining Prior Geological Information**: - Incorporate the prior geological information provided by the interpreted formation interfaces into the joint reflectivity and \(Q\) estimation, which improves the objectivity and accuracy of the estimation. ### Advantages of the Method - **Objectivity and Accuracy**: By integrating the prior geological information provided by the interpreted formation interfaces, the accuracy of the \(Q\) model and its ability to describe underground structural features are improved. - **High - Precision Structural Interval \(Q\) Estimation**: It can achieve high - precision structural interval \(Q\) estimation and fully compensate for \(Q\) - related attenuation. - **Sparse Reflectivity Estimation**: Ensure that the estimated reflectivity remains relatively sparse, which is in line with the actual geological situation. ### Experimental Verification The paper verifies the effectiveness of the proposed method through experiments on synthetic data and field data. The results show that this method can not only accurately estimate the structural interval \(Q\) and the corresponding reflectivity, but also effectively compensate for \(Q\) - related attenuation and retain the original geological structure information. ### Conclusion The paper proposes an advanced joint reflectivity and structural interval \(Q\) estimation technique based on non - stationary sparse inversion, which can accurately estimate the \(Q\) model and compensate for the attenuation effect while improving seismic resolution, and is especially suitable for \(Q\) compensation along formation interfaces.