Tear‐borne interleukin 1‐beta and transforming growth factor‐beta and its relationship with clinical parameters in neophytes contact lens wearers

Eduardo Insua Pereira,Madalena Lira,Ana Paula Sampaio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.16242
2024-01-01
Acta Ophthalmologica
Abstract:Aims/Purpose: To determine the presence of Interleukin 1‐beta (IL1‐β) and Transforming growth factor‐beta (TGF‐β) in the tears of neophytes contact lens wearers; and investigate the relationship between their concentration, tear stability, and ocular physiology findings. Methods: In this clinical trial, 12 neophytes (5 males, 24.0 ± 5.0 years) were dispensed with delefilcon A contact lenses. Physiological responses (bulbar and limbal hyperemia), non‐invasive tear break‐up times, and tear sample collections were obtained in the morning (before lens insertion; 9–10 a.m.) and afternoon (before lens removal; 7–8 p.m.) of the same day. The tear samples were assayed for IL1‐β and TGF‐β concentrations using Enzyme‐Linked Immunoabsorbent Assay kits. A parallel control group of 11 individuals (6 males, 25.0 ± 5.0) was also assessed to determine the levels of the biomarkers in the tears of non‐contact lens wearers. Results: Patients wore lenses for an average of 7:20 [6,9] h. Bulbar and limbal hyperemia increased throughout the day ( p < 0.001). Tear break‐up times were lower in the afternoon compared to the morning assessment (4.7 ± 2.0 Vs. 12.2 ± 8.8 seconds; p < 0.001). The IL1‐β levels were higher in neophytes compared to controls (3.2 ± 4.7 Vs. 0.1 ± 0.1 ρg/ml; p = 0.05) but only in the afternoon. A significant correlation was found between IL1‐β concentration, bulbar (r = 0.405, p = 0.008), and limbal hyperemia (r = 0.499, p = 0.027) in the morning period. No substantial changes were reported for TGF‐β. Conclusions: The use of contact lenses might alter the IL1‐β regulatory mechanisms and disturb ocular surface homeostasis. However, more clinical evidence is needed to understand this phenomenon.
ophthalmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?