The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969—The Brave New World of Environmental Legislation

F. Friedman

Abstract:*Mr. Friedman is an attorney with Atlantic Richfield Company in Denver, Colorado. He has an A.B. degree (1962) and an LL.B. (1965) from Columbia University and was formerly with the U.S. Department of Justice, Appellate Section, Land and Natural Resources Division. *83 Stat. 852, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., (1970). Title I of NEPA has been the portion of the statute subject to litigation. Title II deals with the Council on Environmental Quality, an advisory body created to establish coordination of Federal agencies and develop long term policies. Sections 101, 102, and 104 of NEPA, as applied by administrative agencies and the courts, are the subject of this article. Section 104 will be discussed in conjunction with Calvert Cliffs' Coord. Com. v. United States AEC, 449 F.2d 1109 (D.C. Cir., 1971). For a complete textual analysis of NEPA, see White, Note, A Panoramic View of the National Environmental Policy Act; 16 How. LJ. 116, 125 (1970); see also Sive, Some Thoughts of an Environmental Lawyer in the Wilderness of Administrative Law, 70 Colum. L. Rev. 612 (1970); Hanks & Hanks, An Environmental Bill of Rights: The Citizen Suit and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 24 Rutgers L. Rev. 23 (1970); Peterson, An Analysis of Title I of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 1 Envir. L. Rptr. 50035 (1971); Yannacone, National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 1 Envir. Law 8 (1970); Note, The National Environmental Policy Act: A Sheep in Wolfs Clothing?, 37 Brooklyn L. Rev. 139 (1970). 2 One commentator has noted: There is no indication that Congress considered the possibility that the provisions of NEPA would give rise to litigation or that NEPA would be regarded as creating judicially enforceable rights or duties. It is a remarkable fact, therefore, that there have been, in the 26 months after NEPA became law, more than 75 judicial decisions involving NEPA, and that tl^e majority of these decisions have recognized that NEPA has created duties on the part of Federal officials which private litigants have the right to enforce through court actions. Green, The National Environmental Policy Act in the Courts (The Conservation Foundation, Wash. D.C, 1972) at 12.

Law,Political Science,Environmental Science