Abstract:Gong and colleagues recently revealed that +ssRNA viruses encode additional functional proteins in their (−)-strand replication intermediates (−RNA) [6], which challenges the current consensus that −RNA lacks coding capacity. This surprising discovery raises an important question: To what extent is this expression mode shared among viruses? +ssRNA viruses require the synthesis of minus-strand RNA (−RNA) using their genomic RNA as a template. Based on the current concept, all viral proteins are translated via viral genomic RNA (and subgenomic RNA), whereas −RNA is considered a viral replication intermediate devoid of any coding capacity. However, Gong and colleagues recently reported that animal and plant +ssRNA viruses contain multiple conserved small reverse ORFs (rORFs) in their −RNA (Fig 1A) [6]. The identified rORFs are very short, encode small peptides (<10 kDa), and overlap part of known coding ORFs. This may explain why they were not discovered until recently when sensitive comparative genomic and proteomics methods became available. Gong and colleagues showed that the small rORFs in the −RNA of SARS-CoV-2 could suppress type-I interferon (IFN-I) production and facilitate vesicular stomatitis virus infection. Using turnip mosaic virus (TuMV, the family Potyviridae ) as a model of plant +ssRNA viruses, the authors demonstrated that small proteins encoded by the rORFs display specific subcellular localizations. The TuMV rORF2 protein, one of the most conserved proteins encoded by rORFs in the Potyviridae family—which encompasses the highest number of known plant-infecting RNA virus species—forms punctate granules that localize in the perinuclear region and colocalizes with viral replication complexes. rORF2 can directly interact with the TuMV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). Deletion of rORF2 is lethal to the virus, and ectopic expression of rORF2 rescues the deletion mutant [7]. These results establish that the −RNA strand of 2 unrelated +ssRNA viruses infecting organisms from different kingdoms of life encodes proteins with biological functions essential for viral pathogenesis and infection. Most eukaryotic mRNAs are translated in a cap-dependent fashion. As mentioned above, viruses have evolved multiple noncanonical mechanisms for efficient translation of viral proteins. Different viruses may employ different translation strategies to satisfy their specific needs [2]. Gong and colleagues found that SARS-CoV-2 and TuMV may utilize IRES to recruit ribosomes and facilitate the translation of these rORF-encoded small proteins [6]. Narnaviruses are +ssRNA viruses that infect diverse organisms, including fungi, plants, protists, arthropods, and nematodes. Recently, a large ORF with a yet unknown translation mechanism was identified in the −RNA of different narnaviruses (Fig 1A) [1,3,4]. In this report, Dinan and colleagues conducted a systematical analysis of narnaviral sequences available in the public domain and found that long rORFs are widespread in one clade of narnaviruses and frequently occupy >95% of the genome, since these ORFs comprise some of the longest-known overlapping genes, indicating their broad relevance to understanding overlapping gene evolution and the de novo origin of genes [3,4]. Consistently, Zhang and colleagues reported that a positionally conserved rORF within the −RNA of a novel narnavirus, Puccinia striiformis virus 5 (PsV5) (Fig 1A), from the devastating wheat stripe rust fungus P . striiformis f . sp. tritici (Pst). They found that overexpression of this rORF enhanced the wheat's susceptibility to Pst infection and also boosted Fusarium graminearum virulence [4], thus providing evidence for the biological relevance of this rORF. Taken together, recently emerging evidence [1,3–6] subverts the previous cognition that +ssRNA viruses encode all proteins solely on the +RNA, and the −RNA of +ssRNA viruses does not encode proteins. The proteome of +ssRNA viruses shall be revisited for expansion, and the biological functions of these rORF-encoded proteins need to be investigated.

Direct translation of incoming retroviral genomes

The Reverse Genetics Systems for Human and Animal RNA Viruses

Interferon-Stimulated Genes that Target Retrovirus Translation

Hidden viral proteins: How powerful are they?

Host-like RNA Elements Regulate Virus Translation

The Paradoxes of Viral mRNA Translation during Mammalian Orthoreovirus Infection

Origin and functional role of antisense transcription in endogenous and exogenous retroviruses

Long Terminal Repeats of Gammaretroviruses Retain Stable Expression after Integration Retargeting

Plant and animal positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses encode small proteins important for viral infection in their negative-sense strand

Ribosomal control in RNA virus-infected cells

De novo gene synthesis by an antiviral reverse transcriptase

Visualizing the translation and packaging of HIV-1 full-length RNA

Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factors Shape RNA Viruses Resistance in Plants

Rescue of a Plant Negative-Strand RNA Virus from Cloned Cdna: Insights into Enveloped Plant Virus Movement and Morphogenesis.

Deciphering the impact of parameters influencing transgene expression kinetics after repeated cell transduction with integration-deficient retroviral vectors

Ribonucleoprotein transport in Negative Strand RNA viruses

A rapid and versatile reverse genetics approach for generating recombinant positive-strand RNA viruses that use IRES-mediated translation

Emerging translation strategies during virus–host interaction

Role of Nucleocytoplasmic RNA Transport during the Life Cycle of Retroviruses

Analysis of the human immunodeficiency virus-1 RNA packageome

Virus propagation linked to exceedingly rare gene-expression errors