Abstract:Geometrical representation method plays a fundamental role in aerodynamic design in that it makes preparation for design space. A good design space should be composed of design variables that are more likely to attain the solution to the problem than others. This study finds that due to the characteristics of Bernstein polynomials, a conventional class-shape transformation (CST) geometrical representation method is insufficiently focused on the leading-edge region of airfoils/wings. However, more aerodynamic attention is required there because it has strong relationship with the aerodynamic performance of whole geometry. The lack of design variables assigned to the leading-edge region is likely to compromise the effort in finding better optimization results in design space. While maintaining the convenience and accuracy of conventional CST, this study proposes two types of modifications to add more aerodynamic insights into the leading-edge region: (1) an approach of supplementary vertical CST aiming to describe the leading-edge region upon the fitting result of conventional CST; (2) an approach of globally transforming airfoil surfaces into a single-value function with respect to x-direction so that the leading-edge region avoids being split up into two separate parts. With those two modifications, the leading edge can be put to the center of geometric description by rotating the local coordinate system after tackling some other issues that come with the operation. Modification 1 is intuitive, although it requires additional attention to some parameters for the continuity between the leading-edge region and other regions of the airfoil. Modification 2 is convenient to implement, but has limitations on accuracy control because the result of shape error has to account for the introduction global transforming function. Two modifications are illustrated, and their applications are discussed in the study, showing the perspective of being utilized in aerodynamic design that involves delicate difference of aerodynamic performance brought by variations of leading-edge shape.

Modification of the Class-Shape-Transformation Parameterization Based on Radial Basis Functions

Particle Swarm Optimization of Aerodynamic Shapes with Nonuniform Shape Parameter–Based Radial Basis Function

Sensitivity-Based Parameterization for Aerodynamic Shape Global Optimization

Multiobjective Shape Optimization of A Hypersonic Lifting Body Using A Correlation-Based Transition Model

Adjoint-Response Surface Method in Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Turbomachinery Blades

Representation of Complex Optical Surfaces with Adaptive Radial Basis Functions

Modifications of class-shape transformation driven by aerodynamic concerns over leading-edge region

Airfoil Parameterization Evaluation Based on a Modified PARASEC Method for a H-Darrious Rotor

Aerothermodynamic Shape Optimization of a Hypersonic Lifting Body

A mid-range approximation method assisted by trust region strategy for aerodynamic shape optimization

Data-driven surrogate model for aerodynamic design using separable shape tensor method

Aerodynamic shape optimization using design-variables-screening method

Non-uniform rational B-splines-based aerodynamic shape design optimization with the DLR TAU code

A Novel Metric-Based Geometric Parameterization Approach with Performance Filtration

Constraint-based parameterization using FFD and multi-objective design optimization of a hypersonic vehicle

Active Subspaces of Airfoil Shape Parameterizations

An Efficient Scheme for Describing Airfoils Using Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines

Shape Optimization of Autonomous Underwater Helicopters Based on Different Parameter Curves and Various Optimization Algorithms

Aerodynamic shape optimization based on Proper Orthogonal Decomposition reparameterization under small training sets

Efficient aerodynamic shape optimization with the metric-based POD parameterization method

Parameter-free shape optimization: various shape updates for engineering applications