Diagnostic Model for Proliferative HCC Using LI‐RADS: Assessing Therapeutic Outcomes in Hepatectomy and TKI‐ICI Combination

Mengtian Lu,Zuyi Yan,Qi Qu,Guodong Zhu,Lei Xu,Maotong Liu,Jifeng Jiang,Chunyan Gu,Ying Chen,Tao Zhang,Xueqin Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29400
IF: 4.4
2024-04-24
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:Background Proliferative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), aggressive with poor prognosis, and lacks reliable MRI diagnosis. Purpose To develop a diagnostic model for proliferative HCC using liver imaging reporting and data system (LI‐RADS) and assess its prognostic value. Study Type Retrospective. Population 241 HCC patients underwent hepatectomy (90 proliferative HCCs: 151 nonproliferative HCCs), divided into the training (N = 167) and validation (N = 74) sets. 57 HCC patients received combination therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Field Strength/Sequence 3.0 T, T1‐ and T2‐weighted, diffusion‐weighted, in‐ and out‐phase, T1 high resolution isotropic volume excitation and dynamic gadoxetic acid‐enhanced imaging. Assessment LI‐RADS v2018 and other MRI features (intratumoral artery, substantial hypoenhancing component, hepatobiliary phase peritumoral hypointensity, and irregular tumor margin) were assessed. A diagnostic model for proliferative HCC was established, stratifying patients into high‐ and low‐risk groups. Follow‐up occurred every 3–6 months, and recurrence‐free survival (RFS), progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in different groups were compared. Statistical Tests Fisher's test or chi‐square test, t‐test or Mann–Whitney test, logistic regression, Harrell's concordance index (C‐index), Kaplan–Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards. Significance level: P
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?