Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antipredator vigilance

Peter A Bednekoff,Steven L Lima
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01327-5
1998-07-01
Abstract:The study of antipredator vigilance underwent a rapid and relatively recent synthesis 15-20 years ago. During the rise of behavioral ecology and sociobiology, researchers began to measure how often animals looked up from feeding. Subsequently, the field of vigilance crystallized quickly around a few striking results and an elegant theory. The convenient mathematical assumptions of this original theory continue to channel researchers' attentions today. Although data tend to match these assumptions - flock members scan independently, vigilance sequences are essentially unpredictable, and interscan intervals are highly variable - the assumptions themselves are difficult to justify. Some of our basic ideas about vigilance require detailed re-examination.
genetics & heredity,ecology,evolutionary biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?