Identifying novel proteins for migraine by integrating proteomes from blood and CSF with genome‐wide association data

Peng‐Peng Niu,Rui Zhang,Chan Zhang,Shuo Li,Yu‐Sheng Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.14817
2024-06-21
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
Abstract:With the application of Mendelian randomization and co‐localization analysis methods, we found compelling indications for two proteins (LRP11 and ITIH1) and suggested indications for four proteins (PLCG1, ARHGAP25, CHGA, and MANBA), which might be promising targets for migraine treatment without obvious adverse consequences. Background Proteome‐wide Mendelian randomization studies have been increasingly utilized to identify potential drug targets for diseases. We aimed to identify potential therapeutic targets for migraine and its subtypes through the application of Mendelian randomization and co‐localization analysis methods. Methods We utilized cis‐protein quantitative trait loci data for 1378 plasma proteins available from two studies with 7213 individuals and 35,559 individuals, respectively. Summary data for migraine and its subtypes were obtained from a genetic study involving up to 1,339,303 individuals. Proteins that passed both the discovery and validation Mendelian randomization analysis, sensitivity analysis, heterogeneity test, and pleiotropy test, were associated with ≥2 outcomes, and received strong support from co‐localization analysis (PP.H4.abf ≥0.80) and were classified as tier 1 proteins. Results We identified three tier 1 proteins (LRP11, ITIH1, and ADGRF5), whose genes have not been previously identified as causal genes for migraine in genetic studies. LRP11 was significantly associated with the risk of any migraine (OR [odds ratio] = 0.968, 95% CI [confidence interval] = 0.955–0.981, p = 1.27 × 10−6) and significantly/suggestively associated with three migraine subtypes. ITIH1 was significantly associated with the risk of any migraine (OR = 1.044, 95% CI = 1.024–1.065, p = 1.08 × 10−5) and migraine with visual disturbances. ADGRF5 was significantly associated with the risk of any migraine (OR = 0.964, 95% CI = 0.946–0.982, p = 8.74 × 10−5) and suggestively associated with migraine with aura. The effects of LRP11 and ADGRF5 were further replicated using cerebrospinal fluid protein data. Apart from ADGRF5, there was no evidence of potential adverse consequences when modulating the plasma levels. We also identified another four proteins (PLCG1, ARHGAP25, CHGA, and MANBA) with no potential adverse consequences when modulating the plasma levels, and their genes were not reported by previous genetic studies. Conclusions We found compelling evidence for two proteins and suggestive evidence for four proteins that could be promising targets for migraine treatment without significant adverse consequences. The corresponding genes were not reported in previous genetic studies. Future studies are needed to confirm the causal role of these proteins and explore the underlying mechanisms.
pharmacology & pharmacy,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?